What
about alternatives to oil? Can’t we just switch to different sources of
energy?
Unfortunately, the
ability of alternative energies to replace oil is based more in mythology and
utopian fantasy than in reality and hard science. Oil accounts for 40 percent
of our current US energy supply and a comparable percentage of the world’s
energy supply. The US currently consumes 7.5 billion barrels of oil per
year, while the world consumes 30 billion per year.
None of the
alternatives to oil can supply anywhere near this much energy, let alone the
amount we will need in the future as our population continues to grow and
industrialize.
When examining
alternatives to oil, it is of critical importance that you ask certain
questions:
1. Is the
alternative easily transportable like oil?
2. Is the
alternative energy dense like oil?
3. Is the
alternative capable of being adapted for transportation, heating, and the
production of pesticides, plastics, and petrochemicals?
4. Does the
alternative have an Energy Profit Ratio (EPR) comparable to oil?
Oil used to have an
EPR as high as 30. It only took one barrel of oil to extract 30 barrels of
oil. This was such a fantastic ratio that oil was practically free energy.
Some oil wells had EPRs close to 100. In fact, at one point in Texas, water
cost more than oil!
Cheap (high-EPR)
energy has formed the basis upon which all of our economic, political, and
social institutions and relationships have formed. Live in the suburbs and
commute to work? You can only do so as long as we have cheap energy to fuel
long-distance transportation. Met your spouse at a location more than a one
hour drive from your home or work? Never would have happened without cheap
energy. Eat food shipped in from all around the world? Can’t do it without
cheap fossil-fuel powered transportation networks.
None of the things
we have become accustomed to in the industrialized world would have existed if
the EPR of oil had been as low as the EPR of the alternatives we hope to
replace oil with.
5. To what degree
does the distribution, implementation, and use of this alternative require
massive retrofitting of our industrial infrastructure? How much money, energy,
and time will this retrofitting require?
6. To what
degree does the distribution, implementation, and use of this alternative
require other resources which are in short supply? Do these other resources
exist in quantities sufficient enough that the alternative is capable of being
scaled up on a massive level? Are these resources located in highly unstable
parts of the world? To what degree are the discovery, extraction,
transportation, refining, and distribution of these resources dependent on
cheap oil?
7. To what degree
does the distribution, implementation, and use of this alternative require
massive upfront investments in money and energy, both of which will be in
short supply as the world begins to suffer from severe oil shocks?
8. What are the
unintended consequences of the distribution, implementation, and use of this
alternative?
We have an energy
infrastructure which is incredibly mammoth, intricate, and volatile. It is
inextricably intertwined with economic, political, and social systems equally
mammoth, intricate, and volatile.
When you are
dealing with systems this complex, even a minor change can set off a ripple of
unintended and destabilizing effects. Attempting to make fundamental changes,
like where you get energy from and how much you pay for it, can have
disastrous effects, regardless of how well-intended the attempts are.
Copyright 2004,
Matt Savinar: All Rights Reserved