"Hardly a bunch of old hippies and tree huggers, the fact of their
letter confirms what the sustainable energy advocates have been saying all along
-- that the Bush Administration's disregard for developing clean domestic energy
alternatives places the nation squarely in harm's way."
- Joel Stronberg, the Washington representative for the American Solar Energy
Society
The letter -- signed by figures including James Woolsey, former Director of
Central Intelligence, Frank Gaffney and Bud McFarlane, former national security
advisors to President Reagan, and Adm. William T. Crowe, Jr. USN (Ret.); former
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, among others -- makes two points
abundantly clear:
The United States' dependence on imported petroleum poses a risk to the
country's homeland security and economic well-being. A major new initiative to
curtail U.S. consumption through improved energy efficiency, and the rapid
development and deployment of renewable energy and other available petroleum
fuel alternatives is imperative to prevent a future catastrophe, according to
the letter.
Addressed under the banner of the Energy Future Coalition, the letter further
goes on to explain that increasing petroleum consumption by developing economies
like China and India will exacerbate this risk, and that some foreign interests
have used oil revenues in ways that harm U.S. national security.
The letter stressed that with only two percent of the world's oil reserves but
25 percent of current world consumption, the United States cannot eliminate its
need for imports through increased domestic production alone, and therefore an
equivalent emphasis on demand-side measures - development and deployment of
clean, domestic petroleum substitutes and increased efficiency in our transport
system - is essential.
In the letter, the coalition used a previous statement by President Bush to
deliver reinforce their message. On February 25, 2002, the president delivered a
speech on the South Lawn of the White House saying that foreign oil "is a
challenge to our economic security, because dependence can lead to price shocks
and fuel shortages. And this dependence on foreign oil is a matter of national
security. To put it bluntly, sometimes we rely upon energy sources from
countries that don't particularly like us."
"Mr. President, we agree," the letter says. "We are writing today
to urge that the United States respond - as it has so ably to other national
security challenges - with a focused, determined effort that accepts nothing
less than success ... we ask that you launch a major new initiative to curtail
U.S. consumption through improved efficiency and the rapid development and
deployment of advanced biomass, alcohol and other available petroleum fuel
alternatives."
To make any such effort a success, the coalition called for a funding level
proportionate with other priorities of national defense, somewhere at least one
billion dollars over the next five years.
In addition to research and development, such investments should include tax
credits and other incentives to encourage: rapid production and consumer
purchase of advanced vehicles like hybrids, plug-in hybrids and flexible fuel
vehicles; production of more efficient vehicles across all models; construction
of domestic facilities to produce alternative fuels from domestic resources; and
wide deployment of alternative liquid fuel options at existing fueling stations.
The current effort from the Bush Administration has focused mostly on hydrogen
fuel cell technologies which, at best, are decades away from being commonplace
and commercially available throughout the U.S. Making no mention or suggestion
of hydrogen fuel cell powered cars, the coalition said the federal Government
should consider mandating substantial incorporation of hybrids, plug-in hybrids
and flexible fuel vehicles into federal, state, municipal and other government
fleets.
While there's no official response from the White House, the renewable energy
and scientific community has itself reacted to this effort, with the Union of
Concerned Scientists' chief energy analyst saying that the letter
"demonstrates that the urgent need to capture the benefits of renewable
energy for national security is taken very seriously by many key players in the
chain of command," and adding that "maybe the commander-in-chief will
finally get the message."
Someone calling out the President even more directly on his administration's
generally lackluster support for renewable energy is Joel Stronberg, the
Washington representative for the American Solar Energy Society. He was quick to
point out the significance of those who signed onto the letter.
"Hardly a bunch of old hippies and tree huggers, the fact of their letter
confirms what the sustainable energy advocates have been saying all along --
that the Bush Administration's disregard for developing clean domestic energy
alternatives places the nation squarely in harm's way," Stronberg said.
The national Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) struck a more
conciliatory tone, with Rhone Resch, the trade group's representative saying
they are heartened to see the leadership of military, government, and industry
leaders in calling for more domestically produced renewable energy."
"We in the U.S. solar industry share the goal of strengthening America's
security through greater use of domestic renewable energy," Resch said.
"The United States has the best solar resources in the industrialized world
- our mission is to lead the world in developing those resources. Doing so will
strengthen not only our economy, but our national security as well."
The full letter, along with a list signatories, can be downloaded at the link
below.
Please Note: RenewableEnergyAccess.com and Arizonaenergy.org do not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Copyright © 1999 - 2004 - RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Please visit www.RenewableEnergyAccess.com for great coverage on energy today!!