New Coalition Launches Campaign to Stop Sempra Coal-Fired Plant in Nevada

RENO, Nev., April 20 /PRNewswire/

A new coalition of local, regional and national environmental and community organizations called the Nevada Clean Energy Coalition today launched an aggressive campaign to stop the development of a 1,450 megawatt coal-fired power plant near Gerlach, Nevada, citing environmental, economic and health concerns.

The group sent a letter to Sempra's Chief Executive Officer Stephen L. Baum, asking him to stop Sempra Generation from constructing the coal-fired plant and to consider investment in clean renewable energy resources. To mark Earth Day, the Coalition also planned to announce at a 2 p.m. press conference being held at the Washoe County Complex courtyard in Reno that it is unveiling an educational brochure and website, http://www.nevadacleanenergy.org/, which includes an online petition for the public to voice its opposition to the power plant.

"Nevada stands to lose too much if this plant is constructed," says Susan Lynn, a spokesperson for the Coalition. "Why would we want to use up our water, pollute our air and land, or trash our recreation and hunting areas to send power to another state so a private California company can make a profit?"

According to the Nevada Clean Energy Coalition, each year the Sempra coal plant would rob Nevada of billions of gallons of precious ground water and heavily pollute the air and water, emitting 50 dangerous pollutants like Mercury, arsenic and lead into Nevada's now pristine air in order to generate power for Southern California

The plant will cost roughly $2 billion, take about five years to build and burn 6-7 million tons of coal each year. The power plant is proposed for the Northern part of Washoe County, Nevada, 110 miles north of Reno near Gerlach.

"Sempra wants us to believe this dirty coal-fired plant will be 'the cleanest in the West,' but I see it as a grave health risk," says David Rumsey, whose Parker Ranch is downwind from the plant's proposed 650-foot smoke stack. "Your chances of dying from lung cancer or cardiac disease resulting from power plant emissions in the U.S. are already nearly two-times greater than the chance of being killed in a drunk driving accident. This is a very serious public health risk."

Perhaps most disturbingly, the plant will throw out hundreds of pounds of lethal mercury each year. Mercury is a powerful neurotoxin that is already so widespread that it threatens one in six women of child-bearing age, the Coalition says.

Eldon Hanneman, a serious local fisherman, is concerned that it would take only a small amount of mercury to destroy the Pyramid Lake fishery. "The plant will pollute our air and water. The mercury pollution alone threatens our lakes, rivers, and reservoirs and therefore our fishing."

According to the Nevada Clean Energy Coalition, the price that Nevada would pay does not end there. If built, the coal-fired plant will seriously dampen development of Nevada's renewable energy resources like wind and geothermal by taking the remaining available capacity on existing transmission lines that could otherwise be used to carry renewable energy to meet market demands.

Shuman Moore, project development manager for the Nevada Energy Park, a renewable energy project, says the plant would freeze out better economic opportunities. "Thousands of direct and indirect jobs and millions of dollars in tax revenues will be lost if the Sempra plant proceeds," Moore says. "The Sempra plant would consume all of the remaining available electric transmission space, thereby blocking the construction of any meaningful amount of renewable energy projects and their downstream businesses."

Renewable energy also fills a market demand. Many private utilities, such as those in California, are required to derive 20% of their power from renewable sources by 2017. Most recently, the city of Los Angeles pulled its investment out of the IPP3 coal plant in Utah in order to invest in renewable energy. However, San Diego Gas and Electric, the local electric company owned by Sempra, currently supplies only 4.4% of its energy from renewable energy resources. This is the lowest level of renewable energy use by any major electric utility in California or Nevada.

"Developing Nevada's wind, geothermal, and solar energy is smarter, cleaner, and more profitable for our state than coal generation," says Jon Wellinghoff, Nevada's first Consumer Advocate and Partner and Energy Law Division Manager of the Law Firm of Beckley Singleton. "Nevada leads the way with renewable energy development for our own electric use. We have enough clean energy resources here to also turn it into a marketable product for export for other states."

The Nevada Clean Energy Coalition is continuing to expand as more organizations join in efforts to protect Nevada's future. Charter members include: the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies, Western Resource Advocates, Sierra Club, Northwestern Great Basin Association, Public Resource Associates, Friends of Nevada Wilderness, Great Basin Mine Watch, Planet X Pottery, Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, Citizen Alert, Nevada Conservation League, Nevada Citizens Against the Sempra San Diego Coal Plant, Parker Ranch, Nevada Energy Park, Grand Canyon Trust, Keep California Pollution in California, and Clean Air Task Force.

Contact:

Hunter Cutting

Resource Media

hunter@resource-media.org

415-561-2325

http://www.nevadacleanenergy.org/

Or

Jennifer Zabriskie

Write Pitch Communications

jen@writepitch.com

323.908-7608

Nevada Clean Energy Coalition

CONTACT: Hunter Cutting of Resource Media, +1-415-561-2325,hunter@resource-media.org; or Jennifer Zabriskie of Write PitchCommunications, +1-323-908-7608, jen@writepitch.com, both for Nevada CleanEnergy Coalition

Web site: http://www.nevadacleanenergy.org/

 

For far more extensive news on the energy/power visit:  http://www.energycentral.com .

Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.