When some chemical manufacturing organizations in Texas wanted to
cut their electricity rates, they decided to aggregate their buying
power to create more leverage over potential providers. Altogether,
400 chemical makers and suppliers there have banned together and now
use a professional energy buyer to negotiate their contracts.
|
Ken
Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Aggregation -- as it is known -- attempts to create economies of
scale so that the participants in the buying pool receive a lesser
price than they would get if they shopped the market by themselves.
It's an effective tool for residential, commercial and industrial
buyers and is used in those states that have deregulated their retail
electric markets. While residential buyers are often represented by
the jurisdictions in which they live, business customers must rely on
energy experts -- those who combine the loads of similar entities and
discuss the contractual terms and conditions with electricity
providers.
"We have found we can drive margins down," says John Bick, partner
at Priority Power Management in Dallas. "Oftentimes, the difference
between the low-cost supplier and the next low-cost supplier is less
than one percent. Then you have to look at which company is providing
the best terms and conditions. We have not seen a market where
aggregation would not provide those benefits." Priority Power performs
such services in 22 states.
Forming buyers' pools is not a new concept. Businesses with
relatively few employees have combined to get better insurance rates.
It's relatively new, however, to the energy sector and particularly
for those businesses that do not have an in-house energy buyer.
Aggregators say they can top the mandated rate cuts, which are
oftentimes called "standard prices."
With internal energy expenditures often a large part of company
overhead, businesses are pushing state legislatures nationally to
allow alternative suppliers to bid for their business. It's Economics
101: Competition brings lower prices and better services. While about
half the states have implemented some form of deregulation, the ones
with active aggregators vying for business are located primarily in
the Northeast and Texas.
In the case of Priority Power, it says it has 800 customers. About
20 percent of those make up 80 percent of the volume of electricity it
purchases. When it goes to the market to buy power for them, it can
break those customers into several groups that range from those with
similar load profiles to those whose contracts are expiring.
The process appears to work: The Chemical Council of New Jersey
began aggregating its more than 40 members in 1999. Today, it's the
largest industrial aggregation unit in the country and boasts that it
is saving each one of its members 15-20 percent each year. "By
combining our buying power of nearly 260 megawatts of peak electricity
load, (our members) have saved nearly $20 million on energy costs and
have a higher level of budget certainty," says Hal Bozarth, executive
director of the council.
Experience Required
Aggregation can also be effective at the residential level. When
such consumers join a cooperative or municipal aggregation program,
those entities get the right to buy power on behalf of their citizens.
The hope is the sheer number of people participating will attract
bidders that are able to compete with the rates provided by incumbent
utilities.
Massachusetts was the first state to permit towns and cities to buy
power on behalf of their citizens. Those jurisdictions actually become
the default providers unless an individual chooses to "opt out" of
such an arrangement. Ohio, meantime, also allows local governments to
buy electricity on behalf of their residents. That state requires city
councils to approve such buying pools, with many requiring consumers
to "opt-in" to these aggregation units. About 25 percent of consumers
eligible to participate in community choice programs have done so.
"Of the twenty-four states in the United States that have adopted
electric choice, Ohio's experience has been among the best," says Alan
Schriber, chair of the Ohio Public Utilities Commission, in an
interview with American Local Power News. "While it is difficult to
argue that electric choice has been pervasive anywhere, under the
circumstances, Ohio's program has so far been a success."
To be sure, aggregation can only be a success if the pros doing the
buying act as independent agents and if the incumbent utilities allow
open access to their wires as well as act in good faith to facilitate
buying pools. At the same time, the price of natural gas has risen to
the point that aggregators are having difficulty matching the
mandatory price cuts that incumbents are forced to give to smaller
users. Industrials, however, are different animals and can benefit by
exercising their buying power.
Not all customers are created equal in the eyes of utilities.
Office buildings, for instance, use most of their power during the
weekday and during the work week. Hotels, by comparison, use power all
day every day. If those entities are allowed to pool their purchasing
power, aggregators say that it would be smart to shop the hotels
separately from the office buildings. That's because their "load
profile" is more attractive to sellers.
Beyond the simple rules of aggregation, using an experienced and
independent energy consultant is a must. In a recent interview with
UtiliPoint's IssueAlert, Mark Burlingame says that buyers must ensure
that their aggregators are not acting as sales agents for specific
providers. The international retail electric marketing professional
also says that aggregators who do not have the knowledge or expertise
can rarely provide savings or favorable contractual terms and
conditions.
Clearly, aggregation has promise. Good Energy, an aggregator with
offices in New York and Texas, says that all members of an aggregation
pool could benefit from the lower prices made possible by the
leveraging of buying power. It points to the Texas Real Investment
Co., which owns 3 million square feet in the state. After a detailed
analysis in which it evaluated the firm's 26 properties, the
aggregator says that it arranged an electricity supply package that
produced annual savings of about $1.2 million.
"Our main objective was to lock-in substantial savings" for the
real estate firm, says Max Hoover, president of Good Energy. That
includes protecting it from price fluctuations and ensuring it would
not be penalized by the electricity supplier if the business "used
substantially more or less power than it used in the past."
At a time of high energy prices, some consumers are fighting back
by pooling their buying power. Aggregation is the tool in states that
have deregulated their retail electric markets. And while buyers must
exercise caution, many residential, commercial and industrial entities
are taking advantage of the concept.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|