The president and Congress have faith in the hydrogen economy. Newly
enacted laws establish greater levels of research and development as
well as additional demonstration projects so that the distributed
generation or fuel cells that might enable such clean energy is brought
to market in a more expeditious fashion.
|
Ken
Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
A number of impediments such as cost and efficiency stand in the way.
But the Bush administration has authorized $2 billion over five years
toward the effort -- one it says will begin to bear fruit within two
decades. With a far greater emphasis now being placed on clean energy
technologies and reliability, distributed generation and fuels cells are
getting a lot more attention.
At present, those technologies have a small place in the electric
power sector and are primarily used by those businesses such as chip
makers that can ill-afford even a momentary loss of power. Fuel cells
may one day be used to power everything from cars and buses to
businesses. Distributed generation generally has bigger applications and
may be used as the primary power source for a business complex spread
across a campus.
"The hydrogen economy is both real and hyped," says David Bodde,
senior fellow at Clemson University in South Carolina. "Some obstacles
have to be overcome. That said, there is an urgent need to move to a
more sustainable energy infrastructure."
Dozens of fuel makers are now in business and some of them may have
the right technological formula. By 2020, the American Gas Association
has forecast that such facilities will account for 20 percent of all new
capacity in this country, or five percent of all electricity generated.
While only about five percent of all businesses need on-site power,
process manufacturers that are voracious consumers are among the key
prospects.
More than 200 phosphoric acid fuel cells using hydrogen as a fuel
source are operating worldwide and reducing energy bills by between
20-40 percent annually, says the U.S. Department of Energy. Vancouver,
Canada-based Ballard Power Systems, for example, has implemented a
pre-commercial 1 kilowatt combined heat and power fuel cell generator to
be used in the residential market in Japan. At 100 percent capacity, it
has a 34 percent fuel to electricity efficiency rate. By comparison,
modern combined cycle power plants have a 50-55 percent efficiency rate
while coal-fired plants have an efficiency rate of about 30-40 percent.
Serious Questions
Hydrogen does not normally "stand alone" in nature. If it's in water,
for example, it must be separated from oxygen. The goal then is to
produce pure hydrogen-a process that requires other fuel sources to
break the elements apart. Electricity generated from nuclear or
renewable sources can be used to break water down into hydrogen and
oxygen. The conversion process is clean and silent.
"As research, development and demonstration efforts progress along
renewable, nuclear and clean coal pathways, a suite of technologies will
become available to produce hydrogen from a diverse array of domestic
resources," says Douglas Faulkner, acting assistant secretary for energy
efficiency and renewable energy before a congressional panel. "These
technologies will be commercialized as market penetration grows and
demand for hydrogen increases.
To be sure, there's a real question as to how to separate the
hydrogen. Some say that the amount of energy used to make hydrogen is
more than the amount of power produced by fuel cells. If fossil fuels
are extracted to make the hydrogen, then more pollutants would be
released. At the same time, natural gas supplies are already
over-extended and there's simply not enough of it to use in the hydrogen
conversion process.
The Bush administration's ultimate objective is to create hydrogen
using a "carbon neutral" strategy. In the long-term, its goal is to use
renewable, nuclear and coal gasification processes to create hydrogen,
says Faulkner. Opponents of the current administration's ideas say that
it relies too much on fossil fuels and not enough on clean renewable
energy forms, all to produce hydrogen.
Tom Drennen, associate professor of economics at Hobart and William
Smith Colleges, says that the hydrogen economy and the electric power
sector are not yet a perfect match. The primary issue he has is that it
is more efficient to use the original feedstock as a power source than
to use that feedstock to create hydrogen. It can only make sense if
regulations change and limit the level of carbon dioxide emissions --
the ones thought to cause global warming.
"I would not expect a broad-scale application of this anytime soon,"
says Drennan, although he has hopes for a Scottish project.
ConocoPhillips, Shell and Scottish Energy are attempting to build the
largest hydrogen energy plant ever. A 350 megawatt plant in Scotland
that would convert natural gas to hydrogen to fuel. The companies say it
would capture carbon dioxide emissions and cut them by 90 percent.
While the Scottish project might be grandiose, others are employing
the concept on a much smaller scale. Zoot Enterprises uses fuel cells to
produce power for its facility in Four Corners, Mont. The $3.8 million
project is tightly integrated with its own diesel generators as well as
the local utility's grid-all to add electric reliability. The banking
outfit is also working with the Energy Department to finance a micro
grid on its 160 acre campus that will house a number of different
businesses. The goal is to have distributed generation power the whole
site.
Additional research is necessary to spur commercialization and the
funding for it must come in part by national governments. Bringing the
hydrogen economy into the realm of possibility is likely. But, elevating
it to the status of the perfect solution is not. Like all ideas and
technologies, this one has its costs and benefits -- factors that
developers and policymakers must weigh before deciding where to allocate
scarce resources. |