Long Beach has final say in LNG
By Jason Gewirtz
Staff writer
LONG BEACH — The city's federal lobbyists put a positive spin Tuesday on
their efforts to win Long Beach concessions from recent transportation
and energy bills, despite the city getting a portion of what it sought
from the measures.
E. Del Smith, whose Washington lobbying firm represents Long Beach,
said the city got enough in the transportation bill to show encouraging
signs for more federal funds in the future. And the energy bill, while
granting the federal government more power over liquefied natural gas
terminals like one proposed in the Port of Long Beach, still gives the
port final say over the project, he said.
Smith's firm has been the city's Washington lobbyist for 42 years.
The port also pays Smith to lobby on its behalf.
In 2003 and 2004, the city doubled its $113,000 annual fee to Smith's
firm to focus on lobbying to improve the Gerald Desmond Bridge and
expand the Long Beach (710) Freeway. Long Beach sought $725 million for
the projects.
When the bill's details were released July 29, the city and port
received $100 million. The Long Beach region also received $40 million
for smaller projects.
The Desmond Bridge and freeway project competed with 25 projects
considered to be of "national and regional significance," a designation
that U.S. Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald, D-Long Beach, helped secure.
Six of the projects were from California. Overall, those projects
received 25 percent of the available money for significant projects.
Sante Esposito, a member of the city's lobbying team, sought to put
the city's request in perspective. Chicago received $100 million after
requesting $1.5 billion for a plan to ease freight congestion through
the city. The Alameda Corridor East project, which state officials
considered their top priority, got $125 million after requesting $975
million. And a highway project in Oregon scored $160 million, which
Esposito said was the result of it being the only project Oregon
officials sought.
Council members said they were convinced the city did the best it
could.
"We were all looking for more money, but I do not see how you guys
could have worked any harder," Councilman Frank Colonna said.
But Councilwoman Rae Gabelich suggested the reduced funding was an
opportunity to debate the need for a bigger bridge, which would allow
for bigger ships to enter the port.
"My concern is when do we all look at the big picture?" she asked.
Energy bill
The energy bill, which President Bush signed on Monday, contains a
provision that grants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authority
on "siting, construction, expansion or operation of an LNG terminal."
With a terminal proposed for the port, the city lobbied heavily
against the provision. City officials took many trips to Washington to
argue their case, including a final trip in the days before Congress
approved the measure.
Still, Smith said the city will still have final say over the
project, after successfully fighting an earlier proposal that would have
granted eminent domain power to the federal government on such
terminals.
Tom Giles, whose Sound Energy Solutions is proposing the Long Beach
project, said his company would still seek local and state approval for
the project, even if the federal government intervenes.
|