Intelligencer
Bush Threatens U.N. Over Clinton Climate Speech
By Greg Sargent
(Photo credit: AP Photos)
|
Bush-administration officials privately
threatened organizers of the U.N. Climate Change Conference, telling them
that any chance there might’ve been for the United States to sign on to
the Kyoto global-warming protocol would be scuttled if they allowed Bill
Clinton to speak at the gathering today in Montreal, according to a source
involved with the negotiations who spoke to New York Magazine on
condition of anonymity.
Bush officials informed organizers of their intention to pull out of
the new Kyoto deal late Thursday afternoon, soon after news leaked that
Clinton was scheduled to speak, the source said.
The threat set in motion a flurry of frantic back-channel negotiations
between conference organizers and aides to Bush and Clinton that lasted
into the night on Thursday, and at one point Clinton flatly told his
advisers that he was going to pull out and not deliver the speech, the
source said.
“It’s just astounding,” the source told New York Magazine. “It
came through loud and clear from the Bush people—they wouldn’t sign the
deal if Clinton were allowed to speak.” Clinton spokesman Jay Carson
confirmed the dustup took place and that the former president had decided
not to go out of fear of harming the negotiations, but Carson declined to
comment further.
On Friday afternoon, Clinton did end up speaking at the conference, a
global audience of diplomats, environmentalists, and others who were in
the final hours of a two-week gathering devoted to discussing the future
of the protocol, the existing emissions-controls agreement. In 1997, Al
Gore, then vice-president, helped negotiate the protocol, but it never
passed the Senate. In 2001, it was formally renounced by the Bush
administration, which argues that cutting greenhouse-gas emissions would
hurt the American economy.
Some delegations at the conference appear ready to move forward and
renegotiate the agreement without the Bush administration. But
environmentalists and conference organizers are holding out hope that the
administration will reconsider and sign on to the treaty or take steps to
implement tougher climate-control standards. Both options would be
considered an improvement over current U.S. commitments. But the specter
of Clinton’s speaking caused the Bush administration to threaten to walk
away.
In his Friday speech, Clinton blasted the Bush administration’s
opposition as “flat wrong.”
But the speech almost didn’t happen.
The contretemps started late Thursday afternoon, when the
Associated Press ran a story saying that Clinton had been added at the
last minute to the gathering’s speaking schedule at the request of
conference organizers. According to the source, barely minutes after the
news leaked, conference organizers called Clinton aides and told them that
Bush-administration officials were displeased.
“The organizers said the Bush people were threatening to pull out of
the deal,” the source said. After some deliberation between Clinton and
his aides, Clinton decided he wouldn’t speak, added the source: “President
Clinton immediately said, ‘There’s no way that I’m gonna let petty
politics get in the way of the deal. So I’m not gonna come.’ That’s the
message [the Clinton people] sent back to the organizers.”
But the organizers of the conference didn’t want to accept a
Bush-administration dictum. They asked Clinton that he go ahead with the
speech. “The organizers decided to call the administration’s bluff,” the
source said. “They said, ‘We’re gonna push [the Bush people] back on
this.’”
Several hours went by, and at the Clinton Foundation’s holiday party on
Thursday night, the former president and his aides still thought they
weren’t going to Montreal. “The staff that was supposed to go with him had
canceled their travel plans,” the source said.
At around 8:30 p.m., organizers called Clinton aides and said that
they’d successfully called the bluff of Bush officials, adding that Bush’s
aides had backed off and indicated that Clinton’s appearance wouldn’t in
fact have adverse diplomatic consequences.
Several hours after all these tense negotiations had been resolved, the
U.S. delegation’s chief, Paula Dobriansky, issued a statement saying that
events such as Clinton’s speaking “are useful opportunities to hear a wide
range of views on global climate change.”
“They were trying to clean up the mess,” the source said. Late Friday
the U.S. walked out for other reasons.
A White House spokesman couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
Published on December 9, 2005 as
a web exclusive.
|
|
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/
|
|