June 6, 2005 |
"For most renewables (such as wind and solar) that can't effectively
address the oil issue, their proponents should focus on their core opportunity -
"green" electricity - and remain silent on the oil situation."
- Richard T. Stuebi, RE Insider
Let me begin by stating unequivocally that I am an ardent renewable energy supporter. I believe that global climate change is a real threat, that meaningful actions should be taken to materially reduce the amount of emissions associated with our energy production and use, and that ever-advancing renewable energy technologies can play a large part in achieving this vision of a lower-emitting energy system. However, I am troubled by those who claim that renewables can solve problems that they really can't.
In particular, I am referring to those who have been playing off the
increasing public concern in the U.S. about high oil prices and dependence on
oil supplies from the Middle East, as a rationale for promoting renewable
energy.
As but one recent example of many, consider a May 5 column by Molly Ivins
criticizing the Bush Administration's energy policy, in which she states:
There is a perfect convergence of economic, environmental and energy
considerations that all point in the same direction: renewable energy sources.
With demand for gasoline soaring worldwide, with the economies of both China and
India growing at staggering paces, with the world somewhere near its oil peak
right now, our dependence on some of the world's most retrograde regimes is only
going to get worse and more expensive.....Renewable energy sources are not
pie-in-the-sky - they're here right now, and they're going to be a lot cheaper
than oil.
While most of the individual assertions Ms. Ivins makes in her premise are
factually supported, her overall argument and resulting conclusions don't hold
up to my scrutiny. For instance, she notes in defense of her case that
"wind power already has near competitive prices." However, wind power
produces electricity - and the electricity sector is neither a meaningful
consumer of oil in the U.S. nor produces a useful substitute for oil. As she
herself rightly notes in her column, "the single cheapest thing we can do
about oil is not use so much of it," but regrettably most forms of
renewable energy (including not only the wind power she touts, but also solar
energy as well) simply don't help achieve that aim at all.
Unless I'm missing something obvious, the only renewable energy source that can
directly reduce oil consumption is biofuels - the use of agricultural and waste
products to yield fuels similar to those of petroleum-based products. By being
entirely silent on the topic of biofuels, Ms. Ivins not only overlooks the
often-contested economic merits of biofuels relative to oil, but also ignores
the concern that biofuels may not even be environmentally-neutral (much less
beneficial) relative to oil.
I don't mean to singularly pick on Ms. Ivins. There are many others across the
political spectrum, including President Bush himself, who are similarly
confusing and thus entwining in an inappropriate manner the environmental and
supply security issues in the U.S. energy debate. Indeed, I am sympathetic to
many of the stances that Ms. Ivins takes on energy policy. Yet, I must object to
such tortured and ultimately flawed logic that she and so many others are
offering in justification of energy policy recommendations. It's hard for me to
abide by the "right answer" for the "wrong reasons". With
the increasing chorus of such misguided perspectives, I can refrain no longer
from rebutting.
In my view, the fundamentals of the intersection of renewables and oil in the
U.S. energy story are much better restated thusly:
- To reduce both oil imports and the emissions associated with oil consumption,
as opinion-leaders such as Ms. Ivins espouse, there is no other way but to
reduce oil demand.
- Since almost all transportation is based on oil consumption, and the vast
majority of oil demand is for transportation, the only way to meaningfully
reduce oil demand is via changes in the transportation sector.
- Unless and until rechargeable electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, or electric
mass-transit are a significant player in transportation, increased adoption of
most forms of renewable energy (e.g., wind, solar, geothermal) will not
measurably reduce oil demand, because these renewables produce electricity.
- The one category of renewables that could make sense for transportation in the
near-term and hence help reduce oil demand - biofuels - is presently of
questionable economics and may offer only marginal environmental benefit.
The conclusion is therefore unambiguous: unfortunately, at present, oil and
renewables generally don't mix.
This article is not written with the intent to disparage renewables. Quite the
contrary, I offer these observations in the aim of helping the renewable energy
sector. I have but two objectives with my comments:
I don't want to see future negative public or industry backlash against
renewables. If a forceful push for renewables (meaning, in most people's minds,
wind and solar) is "sold" to the public with overly-bold and
irresponsible claims that they can have a meaningful impact in reducing oil
imports, renewable energy will be seen to fail in fulfilling its promise, and
widespread disillusionment (or worse, distrust) will follow. This nascent sector
should not have to endure another "boom and bust", as wind and solar
energy experienced in the 1980's, when the hype supporting renewables was later
replaced by grim disappointment and cynicism that worked strongly against
renewables.
I do want to see the renewable energy industry focus its efforts prudently. The
oil issue is undoubtedly very "hot" right now - it's clearly the
biggest concern facing the energy industry, receiving uncommon levels of
attention from companies, politicians and citizens alike. The subset of
renewables (such as biomass) that can legitimately address the oil question
should take advantage of the opportunity, and work to more definitively surmount
the economic and environmental questions that widely surround their offering.
However, for most renewables (such as wind and solar) that can't effectively
address the oil issue, their proponents should focus on their core opportunity -
"green" electricity - and remain silent on the oil situation given its
basic irrelevance to their interests.
It would be wonderful for someone to invent some currently-unimagined
economically-viable technology or approach that links heretofore unconnected
forms of energy. Absent that, please, let's get the story straight: for the most
part, renewables and oil are separate marketplaces. It does no good to delude
ourselves within the industry and mislead the public by saying otherwise.
By my observation, clearer thinking on U.S. energy policy is needed in almost
all quarters. For those of us in renewables, understanding the true nature of
the convergence of renewables and oil can only better help all interested
parties take more effective actions to achieve our common goals of reduced oil
demand, increased energy supply security, reduced emissions, and maximum
economic efficiency.
About the author...
Richard Stuebi is the founder and President of NextWave Energy, a professional
services firm focused on new energy technologies, with an emphasis on renewable
energy. Before founding NextWave Energy, Stuebi was a Senior Vice President at
Louis Dreyfus, where he was responsible for North American electric and gas
business development activities. During the 1990's, Mr. Stuebi was a consultant
at McKinsey & Company in their electric power practice. In the late1980's,
Mr. Stuebi spent nearly 4 years as an analyst of the North American electricity
and coal industries at ICF Resources, a leading economic and environmental
consulting firm based in the Washington DC area.
Copyright © 1999 - 2005 - RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Please visit www.RenewableEnergyAccess.com for great coverage on energy today!!
The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyAccess.com or Arizonaenergy.org or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.