North Carolina rejects easing of rules for building offshore windmill farms
Jun. 17--GREENVILLE -- By Patricia Smith, The Daily News, Jacksonville, N.C. Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News
State environmental officials Thursday blew away the idea of making it easier for companies to build windmill farms in coastal waters.
"In my opinion, no, no," said CRC member Jerry Old.
Wind generated power is becoming a trend in the United States with two farms
being built offshore of northeastern states and one proposed off Georgia, said
Doug Huggett, major permits coordinator for the Division of Coastal Management.
"The issue has split the environmental groups down the middle,"
Huggett said.
Some see wind as a great potential source of clean energy while others fear
what impacts the 300- to 400-foot-tall towers with rotating blades might have on
migrating birds or marine life, he said.
The tourism industry might also raise concerns because the windmills can be
seen from miles away, Huggett said.
Over the past couple of years DCM staff has received inquiries about North
Carolina's rules governing this type of development from a Washington-based
public policy interest group that advocates wind power, Huggett said. The group
is developing a resource document to identify good locations for companies to
consider locating wind power generation farms, he said.
"Some of the best wind profile data along the coast of the entire
Eastern Seaboard is off Cape Hatteras," Huggett said. "There is also
some real good wind profiles in some of our sounds."
While no company has expressed interest in building a wind generation farm in
this area, it is an issue the state will likely face in the near future, Huggett
said.
Under current CRC rules, only water-dependent structures such as docks, boat
ramps and walkways may be built in navigable waters of the state. And even if
the towers were built three miles offshore, outside of the state's jurisdiction,
the company would still need to run power distribution lines across the ocean
floor and into state waters, Huggett said. Typically, the lines would run
through a tunnel drilled under the beach and come out behind the dunes, against
oceanfront development rules, as well, he said.
As it stands now, the CRC would have to vote to give special permission for a
company to build such a facility.
However, Huggett said, the uncertainty of approval might discourage a company
from spending the amount of money it would need to invest to get to the stage of
seeking permits.
Huggett sought the committee's direction in two ways. First, he asked if
members would consider wind generators as water-dependent structures. While
windmill farms can be built on land, it is true that on the coast of North
Carolina wind speeds are generally higher over the water, he said.
Also Huggett asked if members were interested in changing CRC rules to permit
such facilities.
Members Bill Peele and Renee Cahoon joined Old in saying no on both counts.
Member Chuck "Boots" Elam likened the situation to that of a
subdivision developer spending money before he is certain to get a zoning
change.
"If they want to take the risk, the can," Elam said.
Cahoon said she was concerned that such a facility could gain permission from
one town or county to build while impacting nearby communities opposed to the
project.
Huggett said a company could still build a wind generation facility offshore
in federal waters and run distribution lines to another state. In that scenario,
North Carolina's recourse would be to oppose federal permits, he said.
The P&SI Committee will present its conclusion to the full CRC today. The
meeting begins at 8:30 a.m. at the Hilton Hotel in Greenville.
-----
To see more of The Daily News, or to subscribe to the
newspaper, go to http://www.jacksonvilledailynews.com
.
Copyright (c) 2005, The Daily News, Jacksonville, N.C.
Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.
For information on republishing this content, contact us at
(800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail
reprints@krtinfo.com.