Forests Flushed Down
the Toilet
November 22, 2005 — By WWF International
GLAND, Switzerland — The major tissue
manufacturers are not offering enough recycled toilet paper, towels and
napkins to European consumers and must be more responsible when sourcing
their wood, according to a new WWF report.
The global conservation organization says this clearly contributes to
the wasteful use of forests, at a time when they are threatened
worldwide.
The new report analyzed the practices of the five largest European
tissue manufacturers – Procter and Gamble, SCA, Kimberly Clark, Metsa
Tissue, and Georgia Pacific – which together supply about 70 per cent of
the European market.
It found that the vast majority of tissue products these companies are
selling to European households contain alarmingly low levels of recycled
fibres.
As a result high-quality virgin fibres are taken directly from natural
forests and plantations around the world, including Latin America,
Canada, the US, South Africa, Russia, Asia and Europe, and end up as
waste without the consumer’s knowledge, WWF says.
The European tissue business is worth around €8.5 billion annually and
accounts for 26 per cent of global tissue consumption, with each
European using 13kg – the equivalent of approximately 22 billion rolls
of toilet paper.
“Everyday about 270,000 trees are effectively flushed down the toilet or
end up as garbage around the world, such a use of the forests is both
wasteful and unnecessary,” said Duncan Pollard, Head of WWF's European
Forest Programme. “Manufacturers must use more recycled fibres in their
tissue products, as this means fewer trees will be cut down.”
Toilet paper and towels in offices, schools and hotels are mostly made
out of recycled fibres, and there is no reason why it should be any
different for the same products that are sold in supermarkets, WWF says.
Manufacturers argue that retailers mainly want non-recycled products
because this is what consumers are asking for.
“Consumers have no idea that they may be threatening the world’s forests
when they go to the bathroom,” said Pollard. “It’s a myth that recycled
tissue products are not of a high quality. After all, people use
recycled tissue products most of the day when they are out of their
homes anyway.”
According to WWF, the companies also need to better inform consumers
about the recycled content of their products. Consumers should not be
misled by recycling symbols on tissue packaging which often only refer
to the wrapping paper, and not to the product itself.
WWF recommends that consumers look and ask for the few recycled tissue
brands currently produced by the five major manufacturers as well as
brands from smaller companies for which recycled products are a niche
market. Consumers should also ask shops and supermarkets to stock
recycled tissues.
The report also warns that unsustainable timber harvesting, illegal
logging and land right conflicts still exist in many of the countries
from where the virgin fibres are sourced.
WWF says that the companies are showing promising intentions to
effectively track the timber from the forest to the product, but so far,
only SCA Tissue has taken effective measures to exclude illegal or
controversial timber from their tissue products.
NOTE:
WWF has been in discussions with the five companies for over a year to
find out information which is currently not publicly available. These
companies were compared and scored across a range of criteria, including
their wood sourcing practices, levels of recycled content, public
reporting and their transparency about their emissions to water, air,
waste disposal and use of resources such as water and energy. Although
WWF sees some progress over recent months in the companies’ willingness
to address the issues which WWF raised in face to face negotiations with
them, there is still a lot of room for improvements towards a
responsible use of the world’s forests. The comparative leader in the
evaluation is SCA Tissue with 46 per cent of total achievable points,
followed by Metsa Tissue with 35 per cent, Georgia Pacific 32 per cent,
Procter and Gamble with 26 per cent, and Kimberly Clark with 24 per
cent.
© WWF International
|