Copyright ©
2005 the International Herald Tribune All rights reserved
Pitfalls on renewable energy |
By Barbara Wall International Herald Tribune MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2005 |
We would all like to live in a pollution-free world, but investment
opportunities in emission-free renewable energy might not be as
sustainable as interest in the sector would lead us to believe.
The Merrill Lynch New Energy fund has posted stellar returns, with gains
of 56 percent in the 12 months through Sept. 30.
Poppy Buxton, a portfolio manager of the fund, attributed the performance
to higher oil and natural gas prices, as well as growing concerns about
climate change and energy security.
She cautioned, however, against investing in renewable energy based on
mood and macroeconomic data alone.
"Although there is a high correlation between the oil price and stock
market performance of clean-energy companies, there are other drivers to
be aware of," Buxton said.
"Many companies in the alternative-energy space are small and
unprofitable. If market sentiment were to cool and small-cap stocks fell
out of favor, clean-energy stocks would suffer, irrespective of commodity
prices."
That view is echoed by Ian Henderson, manager of a natural resources fund
for J.P. Morgan Asset Management in London.
"Investors have identified clean energy as an area of growth, but recent
history has demonstrated that share-price performance does not always
reflect alternative energy needs," he said. "Valuations and share price
movements have been erratic, which seems to suggest that no one is quite
sure how best to play."
German solar companies have been on a tear this year, with one of the
biggest companies in the subsector, SolarWorld, gaining 350 percent
through September.
At the other extreme, many fuel cell companies, which produce electricity
from an external fuel supply of hydrogen and oxygen, have done little more
than tread water.
Henderson invested in one such company, Ballard Power Systems, more than
10 years ago in the belief that this was the energy solution of the
future.
He still holds the stock for philosophical reasons but would not recommend
it as a "strong buy."
"The market is wanting to see more evidence that fuel cell companies such
as Ballard and Plug Power are going to be commercially successful,"
Henderson said.
"When this happens and trading volumes improve, we might see a higher
stock price."
Michael Liebreich, chief executive and founder of New Energy Finance, a
provider of data and analysis on renewable energy and technology stocks,
has compiled an index that tracks the performance of the largest 50
clean-energy companies.
Introduced at the start of the year, the Global Energy Innovation index
has risen 32.5 percent so far this year.
Top-performing subsectors during the third quarter were solar (39
percent), wind (25 percent) and efficiency (17 percent). The least strong
sectors were hydrogen and fuel cells, which gained 5.8 percent, and
electricity storage, which dropped 3.5 percent.
Stocks that made the most headway in the three months through September
were Capstone Turbine (174 percent) and Rentech (91 percent). The biggest
losers then were ITM Power, off 16 percent, and Ultralife Batteries, down
24 percent.
Liebreich said he expected stock prices to be supported by the attention
paid to the sector as a result of the Kyoto Protocol, the pact on global
warming, and by a favorable regulatory environment.
He cautioned, however: "The rising tide will not flow to all boats. Given
their strong run this year, there would appear to be little upside in
German solar stocks, while fuel cell companies with low revenue streams
could come under further pressure if investors become defensive."
Some of the most promising long-term investment stories lie in energy
efficiency, Liebreich said.
"The investment cycle is long, as complex contracts take time to
negotiate," he said.
"But companies that manufacture and install intelligent power management,
such as Itron and Power-One, will have their time in the sun."
Todd Warren, a member of the natural resources team at First State
Investments in Australia, said he preferred to play the alternative energy
theme by investing in uranium exploration and production companies.
"The spot price for uranium continues to increase on the back of growing
demand for cheaper and cleaner power," he said.
Warren's stock pick is Cameco, which sits on a high-quality, low-cost
uranium mine.
Henderson said he liked the uranium angle but found Cameco, at a
price-to-expected-earnings ratio of 43, a little rich for his taste.
For valuation reasons, he prefer smaller companies like Eurasia Mining, a
uranium exploration and production company based in Kazakhstan. Henderson
also holds International Uranium.
|