The turning of the seasons will soon bring autumn leaves across
parts of the country. And the coming weeks will also signal the
beginning of the home heating period and the seemingly never-ending
trend toward higher utility bills.
|
Ken
Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Low income energy assistance doesn't get enough money to support all
of those in need. Budget constraints and other pressing needs are almost
always an impediment. That's why the solution must extend beyond
government backing and into the hands of community action groups and
utilities that are at the heart of the issue.
The primary mechanism to get relief to the poor and elderly is a
state-and federally-funded program known as the Low Income Home Energy
Assistance Program (LIHEAP). It assists households with incomes of up to
150 percent of the federal poverty level, providing assistance to either
reconnect households or prevent imminent disconnection. Benefits are
paid directly to the household's electric utility.
LIHEAP is funded for $1.9 billion for the current fiscal year with an
additional $300 million in emergency funds. A bipartisan group of U.S.
lawmakers are also considering an increase in the 2006 federal
appropriation for LIHEAP of up to $4 billion. The spending bills for the
2006 budget year began on October 1.
"We are in the midst of a home energy crisis,'' says Carol Clements,
chairperson of the National Fuels Fund Network. "In some cases energy
prices have increased as much as 85 percent over the last five years,
while funding for LIHEAP has remained level. Funding for LIHEAP must be
increased if it is to remain an effective program." Fuel funds and other
charities provided $108 million in support last year.
The program provides assistance to individuals who are having trouble
paying their electric, natural gas or other energy bills. Homeowners,
renters, roomers and subsidized housing tenants are all eligible. The
cash-based system provides up to $300 in a direct payment to a utility
while the crisis program is allocated for emergencies that include the
reinstatement of service that has been shut off for nonpayment or the
repairing of leaking pipes and broken furnaces.
To the extent that utilities can help address the problems, they will
be reducing their own bad debt and collections expenses. Altogether,
they provided $1.4 billion in the form of assistance and discounted
rates to consumers last year. Chicago-based ComEd, for example, is
providing $2 million to supplement LIHEAP funds available to about
269,000 of its customers, or about 8 percent of its residential
customers
Persistent Shortfalls
The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that natural gas
prices will rise by as much as 77 percent this winter in the Midwest and
up to 33 percent in the Northeast. For the average family, winter
heating costs for natural gas users could jump from $957 to $1,568.
In a letter to President Bush, the bi-partisan lawmakers looking to
increase LIHEAP funding wrote that it is a safety net for millions of
Americans who are paying a greater percentage of their budgets on
utility bills. Between 1981 -- when the program was established -- and
2005, federal home energy assistance increased by 4 percent. That's far
less than the recent spikes in home heating.
"Unfortunately, the amount of LIHEAP money that has been appropriated
in the past is only enough to help about 15 percent, or 4 million of the
30 million households eligible for assistance," writes Sen. Jeff
Bingaman of New Mexico, top Democrat on the Senate Energy Committee.
A sustainable energy burden is 6-8 percent of household income, say
advocacy groups. The majority of utilities are actively working to
address the issue. But the matter extends beyond them to consumers and
other dedicated organizations. The federal government's resources are
stretched thin while the states and the activists have key initiatives
but the shortfall still persists.
Many utilities understand the need. Pacific Gas & Electric has a
program that cuts electric and gas bills by 20 percent. Nicor Gas in
Naperville, Ill., meantime, provides one-time grants to needy
households. Similarly, Washington state-based Puget Sound Energy gives
more than $6 million annually to help low-income customers.
KeySpan has given $3 million to help families in the New York area
and New England while Entergy has also given the same amount for its
southeast region. Sioux Falls, N.D.-based Northwestern Energy will chip
in $1 million to help the disadvantaged pay for heating costs but it
also wants oil and gas producers to do the same, given their
unprecedented profits.
"Households with lower or fixed incomes spend a disproportionate
share of their annual income on energy costs and only about half of
those eligible consumers are getting grants available to them," said
Lorde Nock, manager of Universal Services, which is a package of
assistance programs that helps about 21,000 PECO customers in
Southeastern Pennsylvania each year.
While utilities, states and communication action groups are all
chipping in to address the problem, some say that the biggest step the
federal government can take is to promote energy efficiency and
weatherization programs to insulate homes and save money. Some of the
proposals now in Congress would do just that.
Still, the cost of energy is jumping with such rapidity that a
growing number of low-income households now require assistance with
their home heating bills. But constant demands on federal resources
means broad cooperation is needed to solve the problem. While utilities
and others have rallied to support the cause, the problem is becoming
increasingly expansive.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|