Alternative
electric firms vanish in Toledo, Ohio, area
Sep 14, 2005 - The Blade, Toledo, Ohio
Author(s): Mary-Beth Mclaughlin
Sep. 14--Any prospects have vanished that metro Toledo homeowners and
renters will be able to find an alternative next year to Toledo Edison's
second-highest electric rates in the state.
No other electric suppliers are selling power in the FirstEnergy
Corp. territory, and the current bulk-buying groups will be extinct by
the end of the year.
A key reason is that state regulators have approved a rate plan for
FirstEnergy that makes it difficult for other electric suppliers to
compete, experts say.
"When you look at how their plan is implemented, it makes it
impractical for us to continue," said spokesman Mike Welch of WPS Energy
Services Inc., a Green Bay, Wis., firm that was supplying lower-cost
electricity to nearly 3,000 customers locally but which is not renewing
the contracts expiring in three months.
The Northwest Ohio Aggregration Coalition, which represents a group
of 120,000 residential customers in the area, offered a slight break on
the electric rate of FirstEnergy this year, but has found no supplier
for next year.
Mark Frye, president of Palmer Energy Co. in Toledo and a consultant
to the coalition, said the bulk-buying group was unable to find any
takers, given the FirstEnergy rate plan. "We couldn't get the economics
there," he said, hopeful of finding an alternate supplier for 2007 and
2008.
But for now, all area customers will revert to Toledo Edison, owned
by FirstEnergy of Akron.
Toledo Edison, the predominant power supplier in northwest Ohio, has
the highest commercial rates in the state and is second only to another
FirstEnergy unit for residential customers, and it traditionally has
been a leader.
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio approved a rate plan this
year that freezes FirstEnergy's rates for 2006 through 2008, but permits
the firm to collect added costs for the coal and fuel for its power
plants.
It has a pending request to collect $93 million in such charges next
year, but last week struck a deal with some northern Ohio mayors to
delay collecting that fee until 2009. The change must be approved by the
commission.
FirstEnergy and state regulators tout the fact that electric rates
will be frozen, and dismiss complaints about lack of competition.
The utility said it has done its part to foster competition,
including offering in the past sizable quantities of low-cost power
wholesale to other suppliers who in turn used it to undercut Toledo
Edison's rate.
That spurred interest four and five years ago when deregulation of
the electric industry was in its infancy in Ohio, but now, no such
low-cost power is being offered and competitors say FirstEnergy has an
unfair advantage by being able to collect for higher fuel charges.
"The market has to succeed and fail based on what the merits are,"
said Mark Durbin, a FirstEnergy spokesman. "We can't subsidize the
market as it goes forward."
Spokesman Shana Eiselstein said the PUCO was pleased to be able to
freeze northwest Ohio rates for three years and hopes to find
competitors through an upcoming auction. How well it will do, however,
is uncertain. An auction last year failed because it was asking
suppliers to bid on what they would sell power for a year later, and
experts said that time frame scared away interest.
The regulators, the spokesman said, have no plan to require the
utility to offer low-cost electricity again.
A recent commission survey shows Toledo Edison residential customers
have the highest rates next to a FirstEnergy unit in Cleveland, with
homeowners and renters locally paying 12 cents a kilowatt hour. The
Cleveland unit charges 13 cents; lowest in the state are Canton and
Cincinnati residents, at 8 cents.
Businesses locally pay 13 cents a kilowatt hour, the highest in the
state.
The state's consumer watchdog, Ohio Consumers' Counsel, has objected
to FirstEnergy's approved rate plan, contesting some elements in court,
such as the company's ability to continuing collecting a fee from
customers to help it pay off its debt. There is a hearing Sept. 28
before the Ohio Supreme Court on the issue.
© Copyright 2005 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.
Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|