After two former Westar Energy executives were convicted of
stealing money from company coffers, federal prosecutors said their
intention was to both punish and to send a message to future corporate
looters. Will they succeed?
|
Ken
Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Punishment serves as a deterrent. But a clear cut mission and a
code of ethics that is inculcated throughout the bloodstream of
corporations is essential. It's the foundation to which boards,
managers and workers rely when they reach a fork in the road. It's the
principles they use when deciding whether to emphasize short-term gain
or long term stability. Profits and ethics are not mutually exclusive
but assimilating the two does require placing the concerns of
customers, communities and workforces above the notion of profit at
all cost.
"Given the right environment, people can do the right thing
regardless of what is in the air," says Leigh Hafrey, professor at MIT
Sloan School of Management and author of a book titled "Five Steps to
Mastering Ethics in Business." "It's not easy. But part of what makes
it easier is to give managers and employees the tools to stand by
their principles even under pressure. That's why role models matter so
much."
In the case of Kansas City-based Westar, former CEO David Wittig
was just found guilty of 39 counts of conspiracy, wire fraud and money
laundering. Former Chief Strategy Officer Douglas Lake was also
convicted of 30 similar counts, all for activities before they were
forced out of Westar in 2002. They are expected to receive multiple
years in prison and pay millions in fines. The utility, meanwhile,
vows it has undergone a complete transformation.
How could otherwise reasonable men lose their sense of direction?
Economist Milton Friedman has argued that it is the social
responsibility of corporations to increase profits thereby putting
more people to work and paying more taxes to support programs that
benefit the general public. But business ethicists caution against a
myopic pursuit toward earnings -- one that can blind companies. The
quarterly reporting syndrome that pressures companies to meet earnings
expectations promotes temptation.
Those expectations, however, must be tempered by the needs of other
prevailing interests, namely the well-being of vendors, suppliers and
workers. If any constituency feels slighted, the house of cards could
begin to wobble. And unless the structure is reinforced with values
that build trust, it could all come crumbling down. No doubt, Enron
Corp. is the poster child for unethical conduct. Indeed, the managers
there were a constituency unto themselves.
"Business is conducted through relationships that are built on
trust," says Dennis Reina, with an organizational development firm in
Stowe, Vermont. "To be successful, you can't sacrifice the human need
for that of the business need."
Cinergy Corp., for example, has been a strong advocate of sharing
increasing amounts of information with all stakeholders -- even if it
might come at the expense of other company goals. The idea is that if
stakeholders believe implicitly in a company's integrity, then the
business will be trusted and better able to financially perform.
Cinergy, for instance, was one of the first utilities to agree to
expense stock options.
Ultimate Responsibility
Oftentimes, the rules that govern ethical behavior are not clear
cut. Some ethicists say the lack of such clarity facilitates moral
lapses by helping to create an uneven battlefield. Take energy
trading, which emerged in the 1990s with the opening of electricity
markets but which has been tarred as a leading factor in the
degeneration of power markets and even free enterprise itself. Young
traders were given free reign to increase corporate profits, all in an
environment that had ill-defined rules.
Were they maximizing profits or manipulating markets and who makes
that determination? Clearly, policymakers write the laws and
regulatory bodies enforce them. But corporations and individuals are
all part of the mosaic. Oftentimes, the laws that govern marketplaces
can't keep up with the pace of free enterprise. Under such
circumstances, companies or individuals could justify any "unethical"
choices because rules and regulations are not yet in place. A strategy
that continually "skirts the edges" is a prescription for failure,
says Richard Sides, president of Dallas-based Strategies that Work, a
consulting firm.
"The individual is the ultimate fiduciary," adds Leo Hindery, Jr.,
managing partner in InterMedia Partners in New York City and the
author of "It takes a CEO."
In the heat of battle, though, people can lose their heads. The
human psyche may work to rationalize iffy behavior by claiming
"everyone" is participating. The subsequent peer pressure then works
to "corrupt" the organization. That's, unfortunately, the situation
with the recently convicted Westar execs. And, it's also apparently
the case of former Enron Exec's Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling who are to
stand trial for alleged corruption. In just about all these kinds of
events, the corporate codes of conduct were relegated to meaningless
pieces of paper.
But the same forces that can push managers to evade common sense
can also be positively channeled. It's about creating a team
environment in which the participants see their roles as facilitating
the greater good and not in feathering their own nests.
Despite the systemic failings at some energy enterprises, morality
did triumph. Enron, for example, had its whistleblowers who complained
to their managers that some of the activities didn't pass the smell
tests. Invariably, individuals put in such awkward positions must ask
others and themselves if certain actions would be wrong and if they
are unsure, then they should ask their bosses. It's about treating
customers, employees and communities with dignity and respect. The
companies that have neglected this lesson are the ones now on the
trash heap of history.
"Strong individuals can take an organization diametrically opposite
to where it needs to go," says Cal Clemmons, author of the "The
Perfect Board." "But those who will stand up and be counted will be
proven right in the end."
Corporations must no doubt serve their shareholders. But they must
also try and enrich their other constituencies, oftentimes setting
aside short term needs. The ones that can strike that balance will
serve themselves and their societies well.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|