Environmental
Groups Petition EPA to Retract Fluoride Pesticide Tolerances on Food
September 21, 2005 — By Fluoride Action Network
Burlington, VT — In an unusual convergence of interests, two national
environmental organizations joined with the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) in
challenging the safety of new food tolerances issued by the EPA for the fluoride
based pesticide, sulfuryl fluoride. This action marks growing concern among
mainstream scientists and environmental organizations that total exposure to
fluoride from water, food, and dental uses like toothpaste and rinses is not
safe for vulnerable populations, particularly young children.
The challenge was directed at the maximum legal limits for the fluoride-based
pesticide in foods, which have been set at levels that dwarf the amount allowed
in tap water. In just one case, the EPA is allowing 900 parts per million of
fluoride in dried eggs, as opposed to the maximum 4 ppm allowed in tap water.
One third of the nation’s eggs are sold and consumed in dried, reconstituted
form.
The groups noted that 900 ppm set for dried eggs is extremely close to that used
in toothpaste (1,000 ppm), a level that is considered toxic if consumed in
greater than pea sized portions. “How can the EPA consider 900 ppm in eggs safe,
while the Food and Drug Administration directs parents to call poison control
centers if their children consume more than a pea sized portion of toothpaste
with fluoride at 1,000 ppm?” asked Paul Connett, Ph.D., executive director of
FAN. “Unlike toothpaste, eggs are meant to be eaten, not spit out.”
The precise FDA required label on toothpastes with fluoride levels of 1000 ppm
is:
"WARNING: Do not swallow. Use only a pea-sized amount for children under six… If
you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or
contact a poison control center immediately."
The EPA has set fluoride tolerances for over 200 foodstuffs ranging from 5 ppm
in cheese all the way up to 900 ppm in powdered eggs. The groups warn that at
the maximum level of fluoride a serving of scrambled eggs made with as few as
two egg equivalents could make a child vomit and a four egg omelet could have
the same effect on an adult.
The tolerances were requested by Dow AgroSciences, which is expanding its use of
the pesticide sulfuryl fluoride (trade named ProFume) to fumigate food
processing facilities and storage areas. Dow has never conducted crucial safety
tests on fluoride residues yet scientific studies point to serious health risks
from ingesting even small amounts. A wealth of independent, peer reviewed
studies have found adverse effects on children’s developing brains, the male
reproductive system, kidneys and bones.
According to FAN researcher Chris Neurath, “It isn't just powdered eggs that
will have dangerous levels of fluoride allowed. All processed foods will be
allowed 70 ppm fluoride residues. That includes everything from breakfast cereal
to hamburger helper to cake mix. Wheat flour is allowed up to 125 ppm. For
comparison, the maximum level of fluoride allowed in drinking water is 4 ppm and
the natural level of fluoride in mothers’ milk is approximately 0.008 ppm. The
EPA argues that most fumigated foods won’t contain the highest allowed levels so
there is no need to worry. Yet the USDA’s surveillance program for pesticide
residues on foods routinely finds samples bought at stores that exceed the EPA
tolerances. The potential for a significant number of acute poisoning cases
every year is very real.”
"We are very concerned that total fluoride exposure is not safe for children,”
said Richard Wiles, senior vice-president of Environmental Working Group (EWG).
“EPA is relying on outdated science to support this increase in fluoride
exposure, and in our view has not discharged its legal duty to thoroughly
consider the effects of fluoride on infants and children, from all routes of
exposure, based on a thorough review of the most recent peer-reviewed science.”
Jay Feldman of Beyond Pesticides adds, "This is yet another example of the EPA
pesticide division protecting the bottom line of Dow AgroSciences rather than
the health of the American public.”
According to Connett, "It is ironic that while 11 EPA Unions, representing over
7000 professionals, are calling for a moratorium on water fluoridation because
of its likely role in causing osteosarcoma in young males, the EPA’s pesticide
division has approved the highest fluoride tolerances in U.S. history. With the
Centers for Disease Control admitting that one in three American children have
dental fluorosis [the telltale sign of overexposure to fluoride during early
childhood] now is not the time to be adding more fluoride to the nation's food
supply.”
The appeal by EWG, Beyond Pesticides and FAN can be accessed at
http://www.fluorideaction.org/pesticides/epa-sf/submission.html.
The EPA Unions resolution can be found here:
http://www.fluorideaction.net/epa-unions1.pdf.
For more information contact
Paul Connett, Fluoride Action Network
315-379-9200 or 315-229-5853
www.fluoridection.net
Tel: 802-355-0999