H2S is nasty stuff, and having large frothed ponds of it around
represents thinking that could only come from long hours in the outhouse
alone.
It also stinks. Literally.
I suspect this is a viable lab demo that does not scale up worth a
damn.
Energy going into frothing and froth production of evaporative cooling
energy loss and water vapor in the product stream are possibly likely to
be category killers.
Where does the hydrogen sulfide come from, and how much old energy
has to go into its preparation?"
You will not like the answer.
Due to environmental requirements, hydrogen sulfide is
concentrated before
it goes to a sulfur recovery unit for further processing. Selling
hydrogen
sulfide before the further processing would actually save refineries
energy
and money. This is a net energy gain due to the fact that the
hydrogen
sulfide is an unwanted product and further processing to recover
sulfur is
an unwanted process.
Answer - hydrogen sulfide preparation has to be done anyway in
order to meet
environmental requirements. No additional "old" energy goes into
its
preparation. If you have a refinery that runs sour crude, you can't
avoid
production of high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide.
|
Large frothed ponds will never exist, for several
reasons:
* as you say, H2S is very toxic
* environmental regulations require a reduction in environmental
sulfur,
and I am sure beyond a reasonable doubt that EPA would not permit
deliberate
"dumping" of H2S into the environment, even if it wasn't toxic to
humans
* low concentrations of H2S smell like rotten eggs, and the public
would
never sit still and let a company smell up the whole neighborhood with
this
stuff, even if it wasn't toxic to humans
|
I'll put the question in simpler words for you: When crude processing
winds
down, with the consequential drop in production of hydrogen sulphide, what
sources will make up the difference? You said there will be such sources,
so
what will they be and how much old energy will they consume?