As
summer slides towards fall, fuel-cell manufacturers and automakers are out on
the streets of major cities around the world, showing off million-dollar
prototypes of hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles.
The cars are technological marvels. They're cool. They're futuristic. And
they're virtually useless — for now.
As much as "gee whiz" stories abound about new hydrogen fuel-cell
technologies, one can't help but wonder if we aren't getting a tad ahead of
ourselves. While it's great to have these vehicles to show off, it would be
much better if we had a way to produce hydrogen in sufficient quantities
cleanly. Or had a way to store the stuff. Or an infrastructure to move it
around. Or any number of a host of other major hurdles we need to jump before
we are able to reach the vaunted goal of a "hydrogen economy."
It would indeed be an incredible achievement. The problem with today's
"carbon" economy is that it depends almost entirely on fossil fuels
for energy. These fuels, such as oil, coal, and natural gas, are nonrenewable
resources. There's a finite amount of them on the planet, and the most easily
reached oil and gas reserves have already been exploited. It's getting more
difficult and expensive to find remaining reserves.
In addition, burning these fuels (as well as extracting and transporting them)
releases greenhouse gases and other pollutants into the atmosphere. We all
know the results: air pollution and climate change to name just two.
Hydrogen, on the other hand, is the most plentiful element in the universe.
It's capable of producing more energy per unit than any other fuel. And
releasing that energy from hydrogen creates zero pollution. No nasty
smog-forming chemicals. No heat-trapping gases. It's almost too good to be
true.
Unfortunately, right now it is. The technical hurdles necessary to push
fuel-cell vehicles into mass-production are daunting. Even more important, if
these challenges were met tomorrow, there is currently no way to produce
massive quantities of hydrogen cleanly.
Hydrogen has to be removed from water through electrolysis or from natural gas
through reformation. Both methods currently require substantial amounts of
fossil-fuel energy, which releases pollution and causes climate change. In
short, the benefits of a hydrogen economy will be lost if we have to use
fossil fuels to produce the stuff.
For a hydrogen economy to function as we want, it will require a massive
transformation of our current energy system to become more efficient and to
focus on renewable sources like wind, solar, micro-hydro, geothermal, and
tidal power.
Only when we have large quantities of clean electricity available will it make
sense to start producing hydrogen for vehicles. This shift to renewable energy
will take decades, giving researchers plenty of time to overcome hydrogen
fuel-cell hurdles. In the meantime, our air will get cleaner and our climate
will start to stabilize.
So why aren't we doing it? Unlike hydrogen fuel cells, the technology for this
transformation exists today. It is not a technical problem but a political
one. Two researchers from Princeton University point this out in a recent
edition of Science, arguing, "Humanity can solve the carbon and
climate problem in the first half of this century simply by scaling up what we
already know how to do."
In other words, we can shift to a clean economy before we perfect hydrogen
fuel cells. In fact, taking major steps to a clean economy now are a necessary
condition to having a hydrogen economy in the future. So let's just do it.
Delaying action will only make the challenge more difficult.
As a recent Science editorial points out, "Postponing action on
emission reduction is like refusing to take medication for a developing
infection. It guarantees that greater costs will have to be paid later."
A hydrogen economy may well be our future, but right now we need to focus on
the present. The technology to start the shift to a clean economy exists right
now. There's nothing futuristic about it.
Related Link
Take the Nature Challenge and learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org