by Dr Michael Saba
22-11-04
First of all, let's get one thing straight. Saudi Arabia doesn't
"produce" oil", it extracts it. Any country's "oil
production" is really its oil extraction. That one phrase alone --
"produce oil" -- has created real havoc in world political and
economic circles. During the very heated 2004 presidential season, Saudi Arabia and the Middle
East played a major role in the political campaigns of both major presidential
campaigns. Though many observers would say that George W. Bush was not
even-handed in his positions on Middle East issues and that he often seemed to
serve as a pawn for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, John Kerry took even
more extreme positions on most issues related to the Middle East.
Kerry also stated during his campaign speeches, "Letting the Saudi royal
family control our energy costs makes President Bush unfit to lead the
nation". Was this just political rhetoric? Let's look at the data regarding
energy and oil and see what some of the experts have to say. First, let's go back to the basics. This explanation by Caltech vice provost
and professor of physics, David Goodstein, puts it very succinctly. The Arab Gulf happened to have many of the right conditions for the creation
of oil and natural gas. But those conditions also existed in other countries
throughout the world. Some of those countries include Canada, Mexico, Venezuela
and the United States itself. According to the latest statistics, the US
extracts about 38 % of its own oil usage from inside the United States. The next
three largest suppliers to the US are Canada, Mexico and Venezuela. Saudi Arabia
comes in 4th as an exporter of oil to the US and supplies us with a little over
7 % of our domestic usage. In a recent article by John Cassidy in the "New Yorker" magazine
titled "Pump Dreams", the issue of US energy dependence is discussed.
Cassidy states, "By 2020, according to the Department of Energy, domestic
oil producers will be meeting less that a third of United States needs and the
Gulf countries will be supplying up to two-thirds of the world's oil". So the US is not currently that dependent on Middle East oil though it may
very well be in the future. And Saudi Arabia and OPEC are no longer calling the
shots for the price of oil. Dr Michael Saba is the author of "The Armageddon Network" and is an
international relations consultant.
Source: Arab NewsUS dependence on Saudi oil: Political rhetoric and hard facts
As Youssef Ibrahim, a former senior Middle East correspondent with the New York
Times and energy editor of the Wall Street Journal has said, "Oil and
politics are a flammable cocktail".
A cornerstone in Kerry's presidential campaign was the imperative in his
national security policy -- "Free America from its dangerous dependency on
Mideast (read Saudi Arabia and the Gulf) oil". Kerry went on to state,
"Today, we consume 2.5 mm bpd of oil from the Middle East whose instability
has pushed prices to record highs. These soaring energy costs are burdening
middle class families with higher gas prices and dependence on Middle East oil
is putting our national security at risk".
Most energy statisticians state that about 2/3 of the world's proven oil
reserves are in five Gulf countries -- Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait and the
United Arab Emirates. According to Hassan Al Husseini, a Saudi oil consultant,
25 % of the world's oil is in Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia extracts about 12 %
of the world's daily oil usage. The United States with about 5 % of the world's
population uses about 25 % of the world's oil. And the US consumes almost 50 %
of the world's gasoline daily. Where does that oil come from and how dependent
are we on "Mideast oil"?
"Oil was created when so-called source rock, full of organic inclusions,
sank deep within the earth. The inside of the earth is heated by natural
radioactivity, and the deeper you go, the hotter it gets.”
“This source rock sank just deep enough into the heated interior for the
organic matter to get cooked into oil. Rock that sank deeper got overcooked and
became natural gas. Rock that sank to a more shallow level became shale oil,
which is essentially unborn oil that can be made into a fuel by strip-mining,
crushing, and heating the rocks until you generate a usable liquid. People who
have invested many millions of dollars into trying to exploit this resource have
come to the conclusion that it will probably always be energy-negative, meaning
that you will always have to put more energy into acquiring and processing it
than you will ever get out of it."
John Kerry didn't mention "our dangerous dependency on Western Hemisphere
oil". Though our oil imports fluctuate regularly amongst different
countries, in many ways the US is less dependent now on Middle East and Saudi
oil than in past years. At the same time, Saudi Arabia has turned eastward for
its oil exports and China, now the second leading oil importer, is a major
consumer of Saudi oil.
Cassidy also points out that the US has now slipped to tenth place in the world
in terms of proven oil reserves. Cassidy also says, "Contrary to popular
belief, the OPEC cartel, led by Saudi Arabia, no longer controls the price of
oil, and hasn't done so since 1986 when the price collapsed." He goes on to
say that the price of oil is now determined by supply and demand operating
through the futures market in New York or London, where oil is traded like any
other commodity.
John Kerry was wrong. However, post-election realities are about to set in. And
Saudi Arabia and its energy will likely play a key role for President Bush and
his successors for many years to come. As former US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia,
Charles Freeman said, "After the election, whoever wins is going to have to
govern." He continued that whoever governs is going to have to deal with
Saudi Arabia and common concerns. He said, "This means energy security in
which Saudi Arabia plays a key role." He ended his comments by saying that
after the elections some effort must be made for Americans and Saudis to sit
down and "reassess and redefine the relationship... or the relationship
will in fact drift permanently into a mutually disadvantageous mode."