21-11-04
Webb is a University of Virginia research scientist and a member of a
Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative group working to develop a landscape
classification scheme for environmentally sensitive siting of wind projects. The controversy over the proposed wind-energy project in Highland County
presents a dilemma for Virginia's conservation-minded citizens. On the one hand,
we clearly need to develop clean, sustainable and home-grown sources of energy
if we are to solve our environmental problems and achieve independence from
foreign sources.
Advocates of wind energy argue that the magnitude of the crisis we face is so
great that all other issues are moot. They cite the significant ecological and
humancosts of an economy based on fossil fuel consumption, including
mountaintop-removal coal mining, air pollution, acid rain and global warming. They cite the ever-increasing use of electricity in Virginia and observe that
wind development cannot even keep pace with the growth in demand. They point out
that wind is an intermittent resource and that we will still need the same
fossil fuel generation capacity, up and running, to provide electricity when the
wind isn't blowing. Wind energy advocates will argue that we have to do something, that every
little bit helps and that wind energy development should be viewed as part of a
package that includes development of other renewable energy sources and energy
conservation. But being serious shouldn't require indiscriminate support for any and all
wind projects. If wind energy is indeed the green alternative that its
well-meaning advocates claim, there is no reason not to require the same level
of review and cost-benefit analysis that we would require for any other
industrial-scale development in environmentally sensitive areas. At present, there is no process in place to ensure that reliable assessment
will occur. The process provided by the National Environmental Policy Act only
applies when federal decisions are involved. Yet now that federal tax subsidies for wind development have been extended
and other states are requiring utilities to purchase renewable energy, we can
expect a wave of wind development in Virginia. Surrounding states have already
permitted projects involving hundreds of turbines.
Source: PetroEnergy Information NetworkWind energy has pluses -- and minuses
On the other hand, modern commercial wind projects present their own set of
problems due to the massive scale and numbers of the turbines, the ecological
sensitivity of mountain and coastal areas with high wind-energy potential, and
the absence of any reliable predevelopment assessment process.
They point to the sacrifices of our armed forces in the Middle East. They assert
a moral imperative that trumps other concerns. Wind energy sceptics argue that
wind development is not a real solution to our energy problems.
They point out that commercial wind energy requires taxpayer subsidies to be
economically viable.
This is quite reasonable, to a point. Certainly, no one will argue with the need
for conservation. We are simply not going to produce our way out of our energy
problem -- at least not with the currently available options. And no one will
argue that we shouldn't seriously address the need for clean sources of energy.
If we are serious about addressing our energy problem, and serious enough to
invest our own time and energy to finding long-lasting, sustainable solutions,
we will find a way to ensure that each proposed wind project can be evaluated on
its own merits. That will require a process for ensuringobjective site-specific
assessments for each project.
The process whereby the State Corporation Commission assesses the environmental
effects of power plants has never been applied to wind projects, and the SCC and
other state agencies do not have the resources to conduct meaningful
assessments.
Wind development on our mountain ridges and in our coastal waters will happen
whether we are prepared or not. We need, but do not have, a state-level process
to ensure that wind energy development will, in fact, be green energy
development.