December 21, 2004 Photo: AOC.gov |
"What we need today is a sensible energy policy
that keeps our economy rolling without compromising our national security, our
health, or the oceans and landscape that are our national endowment. As the
report makes clear, Congress and the Bush administration have not gotten this
job done."
- Statement by the NRDC
An organization comprised of twelve clean energy leaders, who each have over
25 years in the field, labeled the study a "well intentioned, but misguided
attempt to balance U.S. climate change emissions goals with reliance primarily
on traditional energy resources."
Members of the NCEP commission plan to take their ideas from the report and
advocate before Congress, the Administration, the States and industry for an end
to the energy stalemate. Congressional failure to pass comprehensive energy
legislation during the Bush Administration's first term is the most telling
example of this stalemate.
The NCEP report contains detailed policy recommendations for addressing oil
security, climate change, natural gas supply, the future of nuclear energy, and
other long-term challenges.
Whether these recommendations are the best way forward is highly debatable.
The clean energy group expressed particular disappointment in an area of
criticism known all too well by advocates of both renewable energy, and the
environment: increased reliance on coal and nuclear.
"While lower carbon emissions from coal conversion are laudable, public
health risks from mercury and particulates, water resource depletion from mining
and conversion, and worker risk from accidents and health (brown and black lung)
-- add up to critical issues not addressed by the study," said the group in
a collective reaction statement.
Members of the clean energy group -- including Donald Aitken, Deborah Bleviss,
Ken Bossong, Joel Gordes, William Holmberg, Scott Sklar, Carol Werner and Jack
Werner -- were also quick to point out the increased national security risks
associated with increased reliance on fossil and particularly, nuclear energy
approaches.
"Adding more nuclear power generators at a time of heightened global
terrorism, exposes to the public to extreme risks that are completely
unwarranted," the group said.
They emphasized that maximum use of energy efficiency tied to the maximum use of
renewable energy is the only way to insure climate change emissions goals are
met wisely while maintaining U.S. homeland security, public health and safety,
and a more geographically and technologically diverse energy system that is more
agile and cost effective.
Solar Down
Representatives for the solar energy industry felt particularly chafed by the
National Commission's report.
The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), the national trade association
of the U.S. solar industry, said the NCEP consensus misreported some basic facts
on current solar market trends in the United States. SEIA noted specifically
that the report did not include electricity generation from rooftop solar energy
systems installed on homes and businesses throughout the U.S.
"Consumer-owned rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems are the fastest-growing
sector of the U.S. solar market," said Rhone Resch, executive director of
the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). "These distributed clean
technologies have high value for their ability to generate electricity at the
point of consumer use. Leaving out solar rooftops is like doing a
telecommunications usage survey and leaving out cell phones."
Including rooftop systems, the U.S. has approximately 185 MW of grid-connected
PV capacity, four times greater than the number cited in the NCEP report,
according to SEIA. The organization estimates that more than 80 MW of
grid-connected PV were installed in 2004 alone. Given the burgeoning market for
rooftop PV, the trade group questioned the NCEP report's preference for an
existing 1.8 cents / kWh production tax credit (PTC) as a vehicle for
commercialization of solar energy.
"For rooftop solar, a 1.8 cent production tax credit is just not worth the
transaction costs," said Colin Murchie, SEIA Director of Government
Affairs. "In large-scale generation - concentrating solar thermal energy,
for example -- a production credit makes sense. But you can't pay for a home
system by having the IRS come out and read your meter to garner $40 a
year."
As an alternative, the U.S. solar industry is calling for simple, sustained,
annually declining tax credits for homes and businesses that purchase solar
energy systems. This mechanism would accelerate the deployment of solar energy
systems, make solar cost-competitive with conventional energies by 2015, and
stimulate over 260,000 jobs in the clean energy industry by 2030.
The only silver lining SEIA could find in the NCEP report was a call for $300
million annually for solar R&D by 2010.
"With the global solar industry doubling in size every two years,
maintaining U.S. technology ownership is more critical than ever," Resch
said. "Increasing the solar budget to $300 million annually will allow the
U.S. to leverage our research and development excellence - and grow solar
markets at home and abroad."
Wind Power Up
While the solar industry was largely disappointed with the NCEP's
recommendations, the wind power industry heard the magic words they wanted to
hear: Long term PTC extension.
Tom Gray, deputy executive director for the American Wind Energy Association,
said his organization was pleased with the commission's recommendations to
extend the PTC for renewable energy sources for four years through the end of
2009.
"U.S. wind generation has quadrupled in size in the past five years, and
could triple again by 2009 with a long-term extension of the credit, putting it
well on the way to generating 6 percent of the nation's electricity by 2020,
something we believe is an achievable goal," Gray said.
Unlike the solar photovoltaic industry, the wind power industry is particularly
well-suited to take advantage of the 1.8 cents / kWh PTC. In fact, every year
the PTC has been in effect, the wind power industry has boomed. Unfortunately,
Congress has often allowed the credit to expire, leading to start and stop
cycles in the industry. For example, this year has been a weak year for wind due
to an expired PTC, but 2005 will turn it all around since a short term PTC
extension through next year has already been signed into law. While this short
term fix is important to get the massive machinery moving again, the industry
craves long term consistency almost to the exclusion of other goals.
There were other notables for AWEA in the NCEP findings including support for
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's efforts to speed the integration of
variable resources like wind into the nation's electricity system, along with
increased funding for renewable energy research, development and early
deployment.
Environmental Mixed
Speaking for the environmental community, the Natural Resources Defense Council
(NRDC) had mixed feelings on the consensus report, calling it a major step
forward in many areas, but also reflecting outdated thinking in several key
areas.
"It is very big news that everyone involved agrees on the need for concrete
limits on global warming pollution as soon as possible," the NRDC statement
said. "This is a major step forward in the discussion. Commission members
did not agree on limits strong enough to get the job done, however."
In terms of the "outdated thinking" the NRDC cited the NCEP report's
section on nuclear power which suggests costly government subsidies to jumpstart
the stalled energy industry.
"Big federal subsidies for constructing new nuclear power plants would be a
giant burden on the American taxpayer, especially since nuclear power plants
continue to have unresolved issues regarding nuclear proliferation, safety risks
and waste disposal," Wesley Warren of the NRDC Advocacy Center said.
"What we need today is a sensible energy policy that keeps our economy
rolling without compromising our national security, our health, or the oceans
and landscape that are our national endowment. As the report makes clear,
Congress and the Bush administration have not gotten this job done."
Please Note: RenewableEnergyAccess.com and Arizonaenergy.org do not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Copyright © 1999 - 2004 - RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Please visit www.RenewableEnergyAccess.com for great coverage on energy today!!