December 14, 2004 Photo: Photo by Richard Krauze, ACORE |
"We find ourselves dependent on imports from
people who, by and large, are hostile to us. It makes (energy independence) a
national security imperative."
- Frank Gaffney, former national security advisor to President Reagan
At the packed conference, 24 national leaders spoke to over 500 experts from
industry and finance in the Cannon Caucus Room of the U.S. House of
Representatives, sharing their experience, expertise, and hopes for the various
renewable energy technologies that scatter the broad energy landscape. The
conference was convened primarily to acknowledge that the past three decades of
research and development in the U.S. have yielded positive results and that it's
time to move into a new phase -- a broad and deliberate deployment phase.
"Back in the '70s, we did not have the technologies," said Michael
Eckhart, President of ACORE. "Now it's time to say we've done well, we have
the technologies, some are commercialized and some are near, but we have
succeeded and now it's time to move into Phase II where we put those options to
use."
The real question for today's renewable energy visionaries is how to get there.
It was fitting then that the conference took place in the nation's capitol
where, decades ago, renewable energy technology was seen first and foremost as a
means to address national security through energy independence.
It's within the marbled halls of the nation's capitol that many experts see the
real potential for growth of renewable energy -- growth they say has been
largely untapped.
A Decades-Old Answer
The first comprehensive message on renewable energy was delivered by President
Richard Nixon during a June 1971 speech, according to Jay Hakes, Director of the
Carter Library, who spoke at the conference. Nixon's speech stressed the need
for national security through increased energy independence, and he specifically
cited the development of a nuclear "breeder" reactor and renewable
energy technologies as part of that solution. A 51-page report called
"Project Independence" would eventually come out three years later
acknowledging global warming for the first time and delving into the potential
for the renewable energy technologies of solar, wind, geothermal, biomass,
hydrogen fuel cells, biofuels and others.
The energy independence report was progressive for its time, but Jonathan Lash,
president of the World Resources Institute, questioned the country's progress
since then.
"Renewable energy is critical to national security," Lash said.
"Ever since Nixon pledged we would be free of oil, our national average has
increased. Now it's a regular drumbeat of information telling us that we are
changing the world we live in."
While much of the conference focused on pushing the federal government for more
than its typically lackluster and inconsistent support for renewables, Lash
highlighted the many legislative successes at the state level. Renewable energy
benefit funds, renewable portfolio standards (now effective in 18 states),
government purchases of green tags, and rebate programs have all served to
foster regional and state-based renewable energy markets.
Many speakers acknowledged these successes at the state level, but stressed that
energy security is a national imperative and only through the guidance of the
federal government can renewable energy truly play its part for energy
independence.
Policy, Military and Intelligence Leaders Speak Up
Some of the most poignant dialogue stressing the national security angle at the
conference came from a panel with considerable experience in that realm. These
speakers included R. James Woolsey, former Director of Central Intelligence,
Frank Gaffney and Bud McFarlane, former national security advisors to President
Reagan, C. Boyden Gray, former White House Counsel to President G.H.W. Bush, and
Adm. Dennis McGinn, USN (Ret.), former Deputy Chief of Naval Operations.
All were keen to focus in on Middle East regimes that assure our petroleum needs
but, at most, only tacitly assure our national interests.
"We find ourselves dependent on imports from people who, by and large, are
hostile to us," Frank Gaffney said. "It makes (energy independence) a
national security imperative."
Gaffney cited the growing scarcity of resources in a world with burgeoning
economies and populations, such as China as having the potential to create a
"perfect storm." Faced with a scenario of increasingly insatiable and
expensive demands for energy, countries like the U.S. and China could find
themselves at the brink of war.
"Situations like this have given rise to wars in the past, that is not to
be precluded here," Gaffney said.
Retired Admiral Dennis McGinn, former deputy chief of Naval Operations, knows a
thing or two about war. Not only does McGinn see renewable energy technologies
as a means to increase U.S. energy independence but also as a way to directly
improve the effectiveness of the military itself.
"We need investment in new technologies for increasing the efficiency of
the military," McGinn said. "Speed and agility are the key successes
so anything you do to make the military lighter, faster and less reliant on a
huge liquid fuel infrastructure makes you more effective."
McGinn came to this realization while orchestrating remote naval training
exercises on small Pacific islands where fold-out, flexible, thin-film
photovoltaic sheets and a hydrogen-powered fuel cell proved themselves
indispensable for powering their electronic and communications systems.
R. James Woolsey, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency during the
Clinton Administration said the U.S. is waging a war against three totalitarian
movements: the Shiite and Sunni Islamists, and the ranks of Al Qaeda.
"I fear we're going to be at war for decades, not years," Woolsey
said. "It will last a long time and it will have a major ideological
component. Ultimately we will win it but one major component of that war is
oil."
Woolsey, who drives a hybrid-electric Toyota Prius and has his own solar PV
system on his home, offered some suggestions to curbing U.S. oil dependence.
They didn't involve the much hyped hydrogen, either.
Two of the most promising renewable energy technologies, in Woolsey's opinion,
are cellulosic ethanol and biodiesel. Both could help provide a substantial
amount of the energy requirements for transportation but they rely on existing
technology available today. Furthermore, Woolsey pictured a future with these
domestic fuels powering fuel efficient, hybrid electric vehicles. And if the
cars were plug-in, hybrid-electrics, every MW of solar and wind added to the
national grid could help charge up the nation's cars.
"This all can help with rural development, it can help with the trade
deficit, deny funds to Islamists and decrease our dependence on foreign
oil," Woolsey said.
Ultimately, any number of technologies and scenarios may be part of the solution
and the framework of Phase II. This ACORE conference kicked off the shift to
Phase II, from development to deployment, and the next conference in September
2005 will try to answer how to get there.
"We're talking solutions, that's Phase II," said Michael Eckhart,
President of ACORE. "What are the policies? We don't know, which is why we
need to get everyone thinking alike. No one person can think of it all. Everyone
must come forward with their own philosophies."
Please Note: RenewableEnergyAccess.com and Arizonaenergy.org do not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Copyright © 1999 - 2004 - RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Please visit www.RenewableEnergyAccess.com for great coverage on energy today!!