Ken Lay's Enron blazed trail for failure in California energy deregulation

 

The Sacramento Bee, Calif. - July 9, 2003

Kenneth Lay's company was the godfather of electricity deregulation in California and, eventually, the symbol of everything that went wrong.

Although the indictment of Lay unsealed Thursday focused on his ties to the accounting scandal that sank Enron Corp., officials in California were quick to recall Enron's role in the state's energy crisis. They said Lay's indictment doesn't bring the story to a satisfactory conclusion.

The criminal charges "will not put money back in the pockets of ratepayers," former Gov. Gray Davis said in an interview.

Enron officials lobbied California officials feverishly in the early and mid-1990s, preaching the virtues of free-market energy and warning that the state's economy would stagnate if it clung to the traditional, regulated electricity system. "The patient is on the ground bleeding," Lay protege and one-time Enron Chief Executive Jeffrey Skilling told the Public Utilities Commission in 1994.

When deregulation came apart in 2000 and 2001, producing rolling blackouts and crushing the state's big utilities with billions of dollars in debts, Lay urged California to stay the course. Deregulation would work, he argued in meetings with California officials.

In an interview with The Bee at the height of the crisis, he said there was an obvious cure for rolling blackouts: raise customer rates. "Price signals need to be allowed -- for people to understand there is a shortage," he said in the February 2001 interview.

Lay also made the case for continued deregulation in a secret Beverly Hills meeting in 2001 with influential Californians like future Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger – a meeting revealed later to great fanfare.

Lay became a lightning rod for criticism among state officials. Attorney General Bill Lockyer, in a Wall Street Journal interview in 2001, said, "I would love to personally escort Lay to an 8-by-10 cell that he could share with a tattooed dude who says, 'Hi, my name is Spike, honey.'"

Discussing Lay's indictment this week, Lockyer said he made the comment after Davis asked him to "turn up the heat" on energy companies as California attempted to renegotiate a better deal on power.

Yet Lay was so influential that even as Davis feuded with Enron and other out-of-state energy companies and blamed them for high prices, Davis often called on Lay for consultation. Davis' then-spokesman Steve Maviglio said Davis spoke with Lay more than any other energy executive.

On Thursday, Davis said he eventually concluded that Lay "either was not on top of things at Enron or was being duplicitous."

Following the accounting scandal that forced Enron to file for bankruptcy protection, federal officials disclosed internal company memos showing that Enron had concocted a variety of trading schemes, with colorful nicknames like "Ricochet" and "Death Star," designed to manipulate prices in California.

The schemes exploited loopholes in the state's porous electricity system. For instance, the company arranged to buy electricity in California, sell it to someone outside the state and then re-import it. That enabled Enron to evade the state's price ceilings, which didn't apply to energy coming from out of state.

Two former Enron traders, Timothy Belden and Jeffrey Richter, have pleaded guilty to charges of manipulating Western electricity markets. A third, John Forney, is due to go on trial this fall.

Recently unearthed audiotapes of Enron phone calls show the company's traders joking about gouging "those poor grandmothers in California."

On one of the tapes, an Enron official talks about informing Lay and Skilling about her work in persuading California to delay a plan to reduce the price ceiling on electricity. But it wasn't clear if the top two Enron executives were aware of the trading schemes.

A conglomerate with multiple businesses, Enron's California ties included a Bakersfield-area wind farm, a failed attempt to build a for-profit "water bank" in the San Joaquin Valley and an investment partnership with the California Public Employees' Retirement System that led indirectly to an indictment against former Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow.

When CalPERS wanted to cash out its investment in the partnership, Fastow created an entity called Chewco Investments to pay off CalPERS. Prosecutors later charged that Chewco was among the largest units Enron created to hide billions in debts from the public. It was the revelation of those partnerships that sank Enron financially in late 2001. Fastow pleaded guilty to criminal charges in early 2004.

California officials continue to pursue Enron. Lockyer is suing Enron, saying its market manipulations cost the state dearly. In a separate case, the state is seeking $70 million in refunds from the company, part of a lengthy proceeding at the Federal Ener- gy Regulatory Commission in which the state says it is owed $9 billion in refunds from a wide range of energy providers.

FERC has indicated it will order refunds of about $3 billion, and Severin Borenstein, director of the University of California Energy Institute, said this week's indictment of Lay won't affect FERC's opinions one bit. The indictment "isn't about the California electricity crisis," he said.

But Lockyer and Davis said the Lay indictment might make FERC more forthcoming.

"I'm not going to be personally vindicated until the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission orders $9 billion in refunds," said Davis, whose political standing started faltering during the crisis.

-----

To see more of The Sacramento Bee, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.sacbee.com .

 

(c) 2004, The Sacramento Bee, Calif. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail  reprintskrtinfo.com