Contractors Find Answers to Utility's Renewable Woes
Jun 28 - Las Vegas Business Press
Renewable energy contractors are finally seeing green.
The utility's poor credit rating has prohibited it from getting financing for
its own renewable energy projects. As a result, the utility found several
contractors in the geothermal, solar and wind energy fields willing to find the
capital to build renewable generation plants that would have Nevada Power as the
primary purchaser.
But as the projects were lauded by state politicians and green power
advocates in 2002 and 2003, financing for these companies became a huge hurdle
as well, again, because of Nevada Power's poor credit rating.
The utility's inability to recover more than $400 million from the California
energy crisis debacle and the looming $300 million payment to Enron still lying
in limbo, have put renewable energy investors on the defensive.
At the end of this month, Nevada Power will seek an exemption from the Public
Utilities Commission for its non-compliance in 2003- 04 to avoid fines, as its
renewable projects have been delayed, mostly as a result of its credit issues.
But while the utility grapples with uncertainty, green power contractors,
chances at financing have slowly taken a turn for the better.
Ormat, a Sparks, Nevada-based company that has built geothermal plants around
the world for over 20 years, has captured about $50 million in financing for its
Desert Peak geothermal projects, near Fallon, a combined 30 megawatts of power
that Nevada Power is contracted to purchase.
With about $10 million in work already done, the company ran into funding
hurdles, but resolved them by bundling the project with three existing
geothermal projects, one in Nevada, and the other two in California. This
approach made it easy to sell bonds, since construction had commenced on the
other three projects and they were not tied to Nevada Power, says Ormat
spokesman Daniel Schochet.
"Since the other projects were at very advanced stages of development,
the bonds sold very quickly," he adds. The Desert Peak project currently
has four wells dug, two of which are successful. Geothermal projects have about
a 50 to 70 percent success rate when drilling, so the project appears to be
moving along as planned, adds Schochet. The two-phase Desert Peak is only a few
months behind its original February and August 2005 online dates. "We'll
slip by a few months, but not by much more than that."
The bundling approach is common in the utility business, says Jake Mercer, a
utilities debt and credit rating analyst for Piper Jaffray & Co. "I've
seen a number of times where an entity that is building power for somebody will
bundle it together ... People [investors] like the diversification and you get
better [rate] pricing that way," he says.
Another project that is hoping to wrap up financing by August is the El
Dorado Solar Generation Station in Clark County, to be built by Solargenix
Energy, formerly Duke Solar. This project too will also see delays from its
expected March 2005 online date, but Gary Bailey, Western area manager for
Solargenix appeared optimistic about the financing. He could not give any
details about the deal, but did say that Solargenix was working with an
investment group and is not bundling El Dorado with another project. El Dorado
is expected to cost between $100 and $120 million.
"We're really optimistic. I can't really talk about how it's structured
right now. What I can say is that everybody has worked hard and everybody's
trying to make this happen," he says.
Bailey also says the bundling approach is not possible for a solar project
yet. "Solar's different from geothermal. It was easier for them because the
other projects were basically done," he says. "That's not the case for
this project." Carlson & Associates' Ely wind farm is the next major
project to address funding issues. The group's president, Tim Carlson, admits to
being a little further behind El Dorado and Desert Peak, but is working with
Gov. Kenny Guinn's office and others in the renewable energy sector to lobby on
behalf of all the projects to investors. He says he is currently working with a
financing group and hopes to have something in place within a couple of months,
but couldn't give specifics.
The Ely project is estimated at about $50 million and will generate about 50
megawatts of wind power.
"We're hoping within a matter of months," he says. "It's
critical to get these things done so that we can move forward to preserve the
portfolio to help the power company. I can't stress enough how much the power
company has been behind this issue. They've bent over backwards."
Like Bailey, Carlson believes that with financing in place for these
projects, future financing for renewable projects will come easier. "We're
confident we won't have to go through this again," adds Bailey.
Schochet also speaks highly of Nevada Power's involvement in the issue, and
says he was willing to testify at the utility's June 29 PUC hearing on its
renewable power problems. He added that the company fell victim to the
relatively new green energy market that is going through some growing pains of
its own.
"Ten to fifteen years ago there was no market for renewable energy so
nobody spent the money exploring the technology. Only when legislation was
passed, did the market develop ... Instead of fining a company, we need to put
some foregiveness into the system," he adds.
Copyright Las Vegas Business Press Jun 14, 2004