Critics raise doubts about Japan's need for fast-breeder nuclear reactors

 

By Satoshi Toi, Kyodo News International, Tokyo Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News

Masatoshi Toyoda, former vice president of Tokyo Electric Power Co. a former adviser to Japan Nuclear Fuel Ltd., is one of those raising doubts about the government's plan to develop fast-breeder nuclear reactors.

"The environment surrounding the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel has undergone a drastic change," he said. "Apart from a long-term task, is there any need to develop fast-breeder reactors?"

It was in 1967 that the government's Atomic Energy Commission made its reprocessing policy clear, saying, "Our country, with a shortage of resources, must try to establish a nuclear fuel reprocessing setup for stable supplies and efficient use of nuclear fuel."

Thus, the building of fast-breeder reactors became the cornerstone of the national nuclear energy policy. They use plutonium extracted from spent uranium fuel and can produce more fissionable material than they consume.

At that time, it was believed that the global energy demand at the end of the 20th century would be 10 times larger.

But energy demand tapered off with slower economic growth in Japan, and the development of fast-breeder reactors stopped when the Monju Fast Breeder reactor in Fukui Prefecture had to be shut down after a serious accident in December 1995.

The rationale for promoting the policy has also collapsed due to the huge costs involved and the possibility that reprocessing could lead to plutonium surpluses.

But complicated interests have been behind the slow progress in revising the existing policy line, industry analysts say.

In October, the Atomic Energy Commission issued a statement and said that if the reprocessing policy is stopped, spent nuclear fuel stocked at nuclear reactors will be full, forcing almost all nuclear plants to stop operating in the early part of the 2010s.

Each electric power company has been promoting the building new of nuclear power plants with pledges to remove the spent nuclear fuel. But if the plants have to continue stockpile spent nuclear fuel, this is sure to fuel bitter reactions from local governments.

If the reprocessing policy does not go forward, a reprocessing plant being built in the village of Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture, will turn into a dumping ground for nuclear fuel.

"Nobody wants to take responsibility," said an official at the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. "So, nuclear fuel reprocessing is called a reprocessing of responsibility shifting." At a meeting of the commission in October, a commission member asked, "Who is going to take responsibility if a reprocessing plant is destroyed by an accident?" But the discussions were suspended with no clear answer to that question.

-----

To see more of Kyodo News International, go to http://www.kyodonews.com

(c) 2004, Kyodo News International, Tokyo. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com. 9501,