31-10-04
Anyone old enough to remember the 1970s and early 1980s -- gas lines around
the block, rampaging inflation, decades-old factories shutting their doors --
can't help but look at the soaring cost of oil with fear and trembling. Inflation, so low for so long that few people think much about it any more,
will return with a snarl. Spooked consumers will cut back on spending, retailers
will slash their merchandise orders, and manufacturers will lay off even more
workers. The recovery, still tentative more than three years in, will shudder
and seize up like an oil-dry engine. Recent government readings of the economy support that assessment. The US
Commerce Department reported that the economy grew at a 3.7 % annual rate in the
third quarter -- slower than most economists had forecast, but faster than in
the second quarter. And those high gasoline prices? So far, at least, they haven't stopped many
people from driving, nor are people scrimping on other purchases. According to
the Commerce Department, retail sales (excluding autos) rose 0.6 % in September
-- twice the rate analysts had predicted. Of course, it'll still cost you. The average price of regular gas in Seattle
was $ 2.068 a gallon -- 7.7 cents higher than two months ago. But gas is still
far below the $ 2.307 average it hit this past May. For businesses like Edmonds-based Innovative Vacuum Services (Innovac for
short), $ 2-plus is plenty high enough. The company, 50 years old this year,
uses large truck-mounted vacuums to clean everything from home heating ducts to
the Grand Coulee Dam's powerhouses. Mott expects to pay about $ 111,500 this year for fuel, a third more than
Innovac spent last year -- even though he's told his staff to buy all their
gasoline at Costco to save a few pennies per gallon. With the company looking at
a third straight year of losses, Mott earlier reluctantly raised his rates -- 3
% to 20 %, depending on the service. Innovac is hardly alone: Such fuel-intensive businesses are hit the hardest by oil-price hikes. In a
recent survey of corporate financial executives by Baruch College, 36 % of
manufacturers said their profits were being hurt by high oil prices. But
manufacturers made up less than a third of the Baruch sample; among all the
executives, only 19 % reported significantly lower profits; fully two-thirds
said their companies' earnings weren't tied to the price of oil in any
significant way. Spikes in the price of oil have preceded nine of the 10 US recessions since
World War II. But several factors have combined to weaken that linkage: the rise
of services, health-care and technology industries; advances in energy
conservation; and fuel substitution (natural gas instead of oil in power plants,
for example). Those changes also allow the United States to get more economic
"mileage" from each barrel of oil. High oil prices are still a drag on the economy. But it's more a light
tapping on the brakes: Although Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said recently that
oil has slowed US growth this year by about 0.75 %, the Fed still expects the
economy to grow at an annual rate of 3.9 % in the current fourth quarter. At least in the short run, gasoline and other energy use is inelastic --
meaning it doesn't change much in responseto price increases (or decreases).
That means higher pump prices act like an extra tax, reducing people's
disposable income; people with less disposable income to start with are most
likely to cut back their spending elsewhere. Some retailers and consumer-products companies -- Wal-Mart, Hasbro and Mattel
among them -- have blamed their lacklustre sales on higher gasoline prices. But
other retailers have thrived in the same environment: Issaquah-based Costco, for
example, said same-store sales were up 10 % in fiscal 2004, and profits were up
24 %. Greenspan and other Fed officials have expressed concern that persistently
high oil prices could trigger higher inflation. A survey of Northwest business
owners conducted by consulting firm The Rainier Group found that two-thirds were
planning to raise prices within the next six months -- even though just 14 %
said higher fuel prices would "significantly" affect their operations,
and 62 % said any impact would be minimal. Should oil rise even higher -- say, $ 70 or $ 80 a barrel, levels that on an
inflation-adjusted basis would exceed those of 1981 -- then "absolutely it
might change the direction of the entire economy," Sohn said. In the Baruch College survey, only 17.7 % of companies said they had passed
some or all of their additional energy costs to their customers; a third
absorbed the cost themselves, while the rest reported no impact.
Source: Seattle TimesSurging oil prices likely won't shock American economy
Though crude oil prices seem to have topped out, they've risen 78 % over the
past year - 23 % in just the past two months. Sooner or later, common sense
would tell us, those high prices will work their way like tapeworms through the
rest of the US economy.
Common sense is almost surely wrong. The US economy is far less sensitive to
spikes -- or drops -- in oil prices than two decades ago, economists say.
Expensive oil likely will slow economic growth this year and next, but not
enough to send the nation back into recession.
"Oil is not as large a share of the economy as it used to be," said
Mark Spiegel, vice president of international research at the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco.
Earlier, the Federal Reserve's "beige book" survey concluded that,
although "higher energy costs were constraining consumer and business
spending," the overall economy still grew in September and early October.
While the impact of higher prices is felt keenly by lower-income people and by
businesses that use a lot of petroleum -- think truckers, airlines and
plastics-makers -- Spiegel and other economy-watchers don't see it spreading
much beyond them.
"It's important to recognize that, unlike the oil shocks of the 1970s and
1980s, oil is still available," said Ed Yardeni, chief investment
strategist for Oak Associates in Akron, Ohio. "Nobody's reported any
shortages of heating oil yet, and you can still go down to the corner gas
station and fill your tank."
"The reality is, we haven't seen $ 50 a barrel [oil prices] reflected in
the price of gasoline," Yardeni said. "We saw $ 35 and $ 40 a barrel
[prices], but we haven't seen $ 50. I'm a bit puzzled by it myself."
But with their engines running eight or nine hours a day to power the air
compressors, Innovac's trucks gulp fuel. The largest units can burn $ 250 worth
of gasoline or diesel in a working day, company president Chuck Mott said.
"We just said, 'Folks, we can't do it for less. We're not a charity,'
" Mott said. "The trucks are what they are."
-- Seattle-based Alaska Air Group spent $ 384.8 mm on airplane fuel in the first
nine months of this year, 42 % more than the same period in 2003. Fuel costs
were a big reason the airline's operating loss in the period deepened to $ 13.9
mm, from $ 1.3 mm a year earlier.
-- United Parcel Service's fuel bill in the first half of the year was $ 620 mm,
20.9 % higher than the year-earlier period. The impact was partly offset by
higher fuel surcharges for air-delivery packages.
"In the '70s, an increase in the price of oil created bottlenecks in a lot
of very important sectors of the economy," the Fed's Spiegel said.
"With the growth of the service economy, that's not so much a factor."
According to the federal Energy Information Administration, the US will consume
about 7.5 bn barrels of oil this year. (A barrel of crude equals 42 gallons.)
That's 27.4 % more than in 1981, the peak year for oil prices on an
inflation-adjusted basis.
Back then, the US economy produced $ 974 in goods and services (in today's
dollars) for each barrel of oil consumed, an analysis shows. Today, the economy
produces $ 1,580 in goods and services per barrel. Viewed another way, in 1981
the nation's spending on oil accounted for 6.6 % of all economic activity;
today, it accounts for just 2.2 %.
Chang Mook Sohn, Washington state's chief economic forecaster, said that for
every $ 10-a-barrel increase in the price of oil, $ 100 mm is sliced off state
residents' disposable income. That sounds like a lot, until you consider that
Washingtonians' total disposable income is around $ 160 bn. Still, Sohn said,
"$ 100 mm is $ 100 mm, and it is reasonable to expect some negative impacts
on consumption." And people at the lower end of the income scale probably
will be hit the hardest.
Recent data on retail sales and consumer sentiment paint a rather blurry
picture:
-- Figures from the Washington Department of Revenue show taxable sales in the
first seven months of 2004 were up 5.8 % over the same period last year. That
includes the period of highest gasoline prices, but because of a lag in
reporting not the most recent oil price spike.
-- The University of Michigan's consumer confidence index fell to 91.7 in
October, on the heels of a weaker-than-expected 94.2 reading in September.
-- A survey of 71 chain stores by the International Council of Shopping Centres
found that same-store sales (sales at stores open at least a year) were up just
2.4 % in September, compared to 5.9 % in September 2003.
Perhaps more tellingly, same-store sales were up 8 % in the five-week period
that ended Oct. 3 -- as oil prices approached and then breached the $
50-a-barrel level.
But according to the Commerce Department, an inflation gauge tied to gross
domestic product rose at a 1.3 % annual rate in the third quarter, after gaining
3.2 % in the second quarter -- suggesting that so far at least, higher energy
prices haven't spread through the broader economy.
But, Oak Associates' Yardeni said, competitive pressures have limited the
ability of most companies to pass on price increases, while the decline of
labour unions and generalized economic uncertainty make it less likely workers
get pay raises.
"This has been a very interesting stress test of the American economy, and
the global economy," Yardeni said. "And so far, we're passing it very
well."