06-10-04
China's huge appetite for oil to power industry and its electricity
generation is a commodity-market tectonic shift whose outcome and strategic
implications are unclear. What is clear is that China is in a great hurry to
close deals on long-term supply, including that of gas. China is the second largest oil consumer after the United States, accounting
for 40 % of the global increase in consumption since 2000. For a random supply
comparison, its Three Gorges Dam will add 10 % to its electricity output. An
energy return that modest for an infrastructural investment that will run to $
25 bn (S$ 42 bn) when the dam becomes operational in 2009 shows the enormous
supply margin that China will have to make up for, if its economic expansion is
not to falter.
Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao received no clear word on his recent Moscow
trip on whether Russia will favour a Japanese pipeline plan or China's
decade-old offer to draw on the Siberian oil reserves by using Daqing in the
north-east as the terminal. It is not a simple matter of Russia settling on the
China pipeline, which is shorter and cheaper to build. Acceding to China's
entreaties would restrict Russia to one customer. It would not seem an astute
commercial move.
Here, politics intrudes. If Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi
attaches as a condition the settlement of its claim to the Kuril islands, which
Russia considers its territory, the deal could be as good as dead. The Kurils is
an issue that tests notions of nationhood and honour in both countries. China also has designs on Myanmar and Thailand in its oil supply search. This
will have ramifications in the region, not to mention Singapore's position as an
oil centre. A China-Myanmar pipeline that will load supplies at the Myanmar port
of Sittwe in the Bay of Bengal to Yunnan province will remove some of the
uncertainty of carrying supplies through the Malacca Straits.
Source: The Straits TimesChina's huge oil search
There is also the trickier consequence to consider: Pipeline construction across
international borders to reduce dependence on ocean supply routes that Beijing
calculates can only get less secure.
The oil industry -- from OPEC producers to modern variations of the Seven
Sisters and hedge-makers in oil trading hubs such as Singapore and Rotterdam --
are crunching permutations to see how they could be affected. The truth is that
nobody can be certain how Beijing's frenetic deal-making will shape out.
The rival Japanese line, using the Russian Pacific port of Nakhodka as the
terminal, is much longer but Japan has offered $ 7 bn in lolly to pay for the
construction and Siberian oil-field development. Russia could then sell oil not
only to Japan, the main beneficiary, but also to China and South Korea.
Industry analysts think that, strategically, Russian President Vladimir Putin
will call for China, especially since he has gained the upper hand in his
power-play with the founder of the oil company Yukos, which had been a major
China supplier. If Japan wants the deal, can Mr Koizumi survive not bringing up
the Kurils issue? The dispute has been the one factor that has kept the two
countries technically in a state of war since 1945.
The same thinking is behind persistent talk of Thailand opening oil terminals on
the Isthmus of Kra -- with Chinese collaboration -- so that East Asian customers
can avoid making the straits loop. At present, 60 % of China's oil imports come
through the straits. What are the implications of a Myanmar that gravitates to
the China orbit? How might these developments and hard-headed Thai calculations
affect Singapore?