Consumers Lose 2 Allies on California Utilities Panel
Oct 27 - San Jose Mercury News
Oct. 28--The powerful state panel that regulates what Californians pay for energy and phone calls is about to lose the two members considered most sympathetic to consumer interests, and ratepayer advocates are fretting over who Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger will name to replace them.
"I think the only thing worse for the consumer than losing 3-2 is losing
5-0," said Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer
and Consumer Rights. "When there's no dissension, there's no
compromise."
Business advocates, however, see Wood and Lynch not so much as dissenters but
obstructionists and are hopeful Schwarzenegger's appointees will inject some
cooperative spirit into the quarrelsome panel.
"Dynamic tension is good for policy-making; however, when it devolves
into conflict and stalling, it doesn't serve ratepayers or the economy,"
said Justin Bradley, energy and economic-vitality director for the Silicon
Valley Manufacturing Group.
The end of Wood and Lynch's terms comes as the commission is set to tackle
crucial decisions on California's energy and telecommunications industries, such
as whether to allow electricity consumers to shop around for lower-cost
providers and whether to regulate phone calls over the Internet.
"These are hugely significant appointments to California's consumers and
economy," said Bob Finkelstein, executive director of The Utility Reform
Network, a San Francisco consumer group.
Schwarzenegger as a matter of policy does not comment on pending
appointments, said spokeswoman Julie Soderlund.
Commissioners, appointed by the governor, serve staggered six-year terms with
a salary of $114,000. The current commissioners are all appointees of former
Democratic Gov. Gray Davis.
Rumors around the Capitol are that possible candidates include termed-out
lawmakers with experience in utility and environmental matters. It is unclear
when Schwarzenegger would announce the appointments.
Consumer advocates said that with the commission currently stacked in favor
of business interests, Schwarzenegger should appoint replacements who will
champion the small ratepayer.
"Will he side with special interests or the public's interest?"
Heller said. "The special interests have their place on the PUC, but who
will speak for the consumer?"
But Bradley said commission infighting has impeded progress in important
issues. The commission, he said, has taken too long to implement energy policies
outlined two years ago under state legislation, AB57, calling for utilities to
plan for future energy needs.
"There's nothing wrong with disagreement -- that's not been the
problem," Bradley said. "It's been a lack of healthy relationships, a
propensity to litigate rather than cooperate and a lot of decisions that just
have taken way too long."
Wood bristles at such criticism, saying he and Lynch have championed due
process to ensure that consumers had a voice in decision-making and that
environmental concerns were considered.
Rushing decisions on energy policy, he said, could invite costly disasters
such as the overpriced long-term energy contracts the state signed at the height
of the energy crisis, Wood said. And industry advocates have tried to delay
decisions they didn't like such as cell-phone-user rights, he said.
"When we raise procedural issues, we're accused of stalling and gumming
up the works," Wood said. "Consumers don't have full-time lobbyists
who work the commission like big businesses do."
Established in 1911 as the state Railroad Commission, the Public Utilities
Commission regulates privately owned telecommunications, electric, natural gas,
water, railroad, rail-transit and passenger-transportation companies. It has a
$96 million budget and a staff of 800 economists, engineers, administrative law
judges, accountants, lawyers and transportation specialists.
The commission has become a lightning rod of contention as market competition
has transformed the monopoly industries it oversees.
Nowhere has that been more apparent than with electricity, where California's
deregulation attempt imploded in a multibillion-dollar market meltdown four
years ago.
Putting the state's energy market back on track is perhaps the biggest task
facing the commission. Schwarzenegger recently vetoed legislation that would
have set energy market rules, saying he wanted to leave that to the commission
under authority granted in AB<29>57.
The new commission will have to decide whether to keep shielding most
residential consumers from recent rate increases, something businesses complain
has forced them to pay excessively high bills. It will have to decide how much
more power the utilities will need to buy in coming years, an issue consumer
advocates say could lead to unnecessarily costly investment in private power
sources. And it will have to decide whether to let customers shop for power
suppliers again, a marquee feature of deregulation hotly opposed by consumer
groups.
The commission also will have to grapple with how to regulate the rapidly
evolving telecommunications business, where wireless,
voice-over-Internet-protocol and broadband-over-power-line technologies have
upended the old Bell monopoly.
Consumer advocates would like to see the commission assert some control over
the emerging technologies, as it did to a limited degree with this year's
cell-phone-user bill of rights, while business groups favor a hands-off
approach.
Commissioner Geoffrey Brown, considered a moderate swing vote, agreed that
"consumer interests are losing powerful allies" in Wood and Lynch, but
said their replacements should not be prejudged on their background.
"You can't gauge how a commissioner is going to act until they've had
some time in the job," Brown said. "Once a commissioner gets confirmed
and finds his or her footing, you're going to find an individual. I doubt you'll
find a commission that's all in lock-step."
-----
To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or to subscribe to the newspaper,
go to http://www.mercurynews.com .
(c) 2004, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. Distributed by
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this
content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax
(213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com.