New Energy Bill: Reducing Our Dependence on Foreign Oil

by Sam Subramanian

"Based on what has been outlined to date, neither the Bush proposal nor the Kerry plan appears to fully address the critical transportation issue."

- Sam Subramanian, RE Insider

RE Insider - September 13, 2004 - Growing transportation requirements combined with declining domestic oil production have led to burgeoning oil imports. Rising oil prices are having an adverse impact on the U.S. economy as evident from recent economic data and stock market performance. We need a responsible energy plan which will balance our transportation requirements with the necessity to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

Rising Oil Prices
Oil prices have been on a roll this year. As of August 10, crude oil prices have climbed over 45 percent since the start of 2004. A barrel of West Texas Intermediate recently recorded its all time high of US$45.04 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. And this has happened despite the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) increasing its oil output.

Earlier in the year, the run up in oil prices was attributed to surging demand for petroleum products due to a strong global economy. Then it was the unrest in Venezuela and Nigeria.

Concerns on security of oil supplies have heightened more recently. Added to the pipeline disruptions in Iraq are kidnappings of foreign workers in the Middle East.

Yukos, the Russian oil company's tax evasion dispute has taken center stage currently. With a production rate of 1.7 million barrels a day (mmbd), Yukos is Russia's largest oil producer.

While the underlying factors behind the dramatic increase in the price of oil this year are a combination of all the above, the impact is hardly comforting.

Weakening Economy
Higher oil prices that work like an added tax have the effect of holding down hiring, consumer spending, and corporate profits. The July jobs report that was released by the Labor Department on August 6 was a disappointment. The U.S. economy added a mere 32,000 to the non-farm payrolls, the lowest monthly addition this year. The rate of employment growth is slowing as business confidence appears to be undermined by rising oil prices. High oil prices are also taking the bite out of consumer spending.

By some economists' estimates, every $10 rise in the price of oil knocks 0.5 percent off of GDP growth and adds about the same amount to inflation. The equity markets have been fixated with the trend in oil prices and have relentlessly spiraled lower since late June. On August 6, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 9,815.33, its lowest level since Nov. 28 after losing more than 300 points over the last two sessions. The technology heavy Nasdaq Composite Index is down over 11 percent since the start of the year.

The Root Cause: Transportation Relies on Foreign Oil
A combination of declining domestic oil production and increasing oil consumption has left the U.S. increasingly dependent on foreign oil. The U. S. Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration states that domestic oil production in 2002 was 5.8 mmbd, about 36 percent lower than the 9.0 mmbd produced in 1985. The total use of petroleum products on the other hand has grown from 15.2 mmbd in 1985 to 19.3 mmbd in 2002.

The lion's share of oil consumption stems from transportation needs. In 2002, the transportation sector accounted for about 68 percent of total petroleum use with gasoline accounting for two-thirds of the petroleum consumed in the transportation sector. U.S. net oil imports have grown from 4.3 mmbd in 1985 to 10.4 mmbd in 2002. Net oil imports as a percent of U. S. petroleum product use has risen from 28 percent in 1985 to 54 percent in 2002.

Based on Sandia National Laboratories and U. S. DOE/EIA forecast, an additional 7.5 mmbd of oil and petroleum products will have to be imported by 2020 to bridge the gap between growing consumption and falling domestic oil production. In 2020, U.S. oil production will supply less than 30 percent of U.S. oil needs.

The Energy Bill: Long-Term Plan for Energy Security
The picture the current events paint as a preview of the future is cause for concern. On August 6, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry outlined a $30-billion, 10-year plan to veer the U. S. towards energy independence. The plan includes tax breaks and incentives for carmakers and buyers, coal producers and alternative fuels research. President Bush responded saying Kerry's proposals mimic much of what Bush had already proposed but is stalled in Congress.

It will not be adequate if President Bush and Senator Kerry just re-ignite the energy debate. To bring clarity to energy security, we need a comprehensive long-term national energy plan that will reduce our reliance on foreign oil while meeting the nation's growing transportation needs.

Both supply and demand sides of the transportation issue will have to be addressed to make a meaningful impact in reducing the dependence on foreign oil. Steps to increase the supply of domestic transportation fuels will likely be required to meet short-term transportation needs. So too will efforts to reduce per capita transportation fuel consumption.

From a longer-term perspective, it is prudent to develop alternatives to oil. Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, geothermal, biomass based fuels and ethanol as well as technologies such as hydrogen powered fuel cells offer the potential to migrate from the fringe. Focused research to mitigate the disadvantages of renewable energy sources such as cost and environmental impact as well as investments in infrastructure will be required before they become the mainstream power source for transportation vehicles.

Based on what has been outlined to date, neither the Bush proposal nor the Kerry plan appears to fully address the critical transportation issue. The House-Senate conferees have an opportunity to deliver a responsible energy bill to the President's desk for his signature. If the dependence on foreign oil is not reduced, the course of the U. S. economy and the stock market may well be shaped more by decisions made in Moscow, Riyadh, and Vienna rather than being determined by the decisions made at home.

About the author...

After having worked for the nation's leading oil and auto companies, Sam Subramanian, PhD, MBA is currently Managing Principal of AlphaProfit Investments, LLC. Sam edits the AlphaProfit Sector Investors' Newsletter.

For Further Information:

AlphaProfit Investments

Please Note: SolarAccess.com and Arizonaenergy.org do not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.

Copyright © 1999 - 2004 - SolarAccess.com

Please visit www.solaraccess.com for great coverage on energy today!!