Power-rebate program irks Nevada contractors

 

Las Vegas Review-Journal --Sep. 2

Sep. 2--Photovoltaic systems convert electrons from sunlight into electricity soundlessly, but some electrical contractors are making a lot of noise about how a rebate program meant to encourage use of the alternate power systems was handled.

Assembly Bill 431, sponsored by Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani, D-Las Vegas, directs Nevada Power Co. of Las Vegas and Sierra Pacific Power Co. of Reno to rebate up to $25,000 for qualifying residential photovoltaic systems. Commercial businesses are eligible for a maximum of $150,000.

Those sums, which represent a rebate of $5 a watt, typically pay half the cost of installing the solar systems.

The state law allowed the two utilities to collect the cost of the rebate program through higher electricity rates.

And even though the amount of the rebates appear generous, many local contractors are arguing that the total number of rebates was not. The two utilities have funds to provide rebates for a maximum of 200 kilowatts this year, and that allocation is already gone.

Any additional applications will be considered for next year when the rebate amount drops to $4 a watt.

All of this year's allocations were made before Nevada Power considered any applications from Free Energy Store's customers.

And that has left Cathy Geever of the Free Energy Store in Las Vegas and some other contractors fuming, because they were unable to get any of the Legislature-mandated rebates to install photovoltaic systems for residential and commercial customers.

"This is an outrage," Geever said. "Is this the way Nevada regularly does business? What special connections do (electrical contractors) have that the rest of us don't have?"

Bob Balzar, director of Nevada Power's conservation program, is unsympathetic to the contractors' plight, though.

Nevada Power and its sister utility in Reno, Sierra Pacific Power Co., made the rebates available on a first-come, first-serve basis under the SolarGenerations program. (Visit www.solargenerations.com for more information.)

The solar rebate program began on Aug. 1, and "it was fully subscribed by Aug. 13," Balzar said.

"I'm sorry the allocation came from the state, not Nevada Power," Balzar said. "It was first-come, first-serve," he noted, adding that all rebate applications were date- and time-stamped as received.

The utilities proposed the process used to select who got the rebates, and the state task force approved that method, he continued.

The Nevada Renewable Energy Task Force recommended 46 commercial and residential applications totaling 198 kilowatts.

Nelson Electric, got 15 Northern Nevada customers on the list; Bombard Electric, eight Southern Nevada customers; Electrical Concepts, eight Northern Nevada customers; and Quality Control Systems, six Southern Nevada customers.

The recommendations will go to the Public Utilities Commission for approval.

"(The complaining contractors) are just unhappy, because they didn't act fast enough," Balzar said.

Further, the utilities' customers, not the utilities, selected which electrical contractors they wanted to hire to install the systems, he said.

Geever complained that her company filed applications for $230,000 in rebates for about 45 customers but Nevada Power required additional documentation. When Free Energy returned with the completed forms a week later, the company was told the allocations had all been taken, she said.

"This is less than two weeks into a program that's supposed to be 12 months long," she said.

Tim Hay, chief of the Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said he would have liked to see the rebate "pie" cut into more and smaller pieces for small businesses. Many of the residential applicants that made the list are big users and affluent households, he said.

Average consumers may not have been as ready to respond quickly with rebate applications, he said.

"I'm sort of reserving judgment on how that part of the process operated," he said.

Allocations for schools and public buildings are still available, however. But Hay also is questioning why Fallon Naval Air Station should get some of the rebates. He believes it should go to a government agency that would use the solar system on a publicly accessible government property, such as a civic auditorium.

-----

To see more of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.lvrj.com .

(c) 2004, Las Vegas Review-Journal. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com. SRP,