Power Study Panel Debates Competition, Consumer Price Impact in Oklahoma

 

Sep 23 - The Daily Oklahoman

Sep. 23--Oklahoma electric utility customers could save nearly $90 million a year if state regulators required utilities to buy power from the least expensive sources, former Louisiana Sen. Bennett Johnston told an Oklahoma legislative task force Wednesday.

Johnston spoke before the Public Utility Purchased Power Study Commission on behalf of Burlington, Mass.-based InterGen, which owns a 1,200 megawatt natural-gas-fired power plant in Luther.

Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co. spokesman Paul Renfrow, however, dismissed much of Johnston's argument as "funny math."

The former U.S. senator said Oklahoma had one of the lowest average electric rates in the country just three years ago, but that the state has now slipped to No. 24.

"I think the record is clear: whenever you have competition, things are cheaper," Johnston said. "They're cheaper in the airline business. They're cheaper in telecom. They're cheaper in electricity."

While not necessarily advocating full deregulation, Johnston suggested a "transition to competition" by requiring utilities to accept competitive bids for all the power they use.

He said OG&E customers alone could have saved at least $51 million this year if the utility had bought more electricity from Redbud and other independent power producers rather than using its own older, less efficient generators.

The utilities, however, said the problem is not as simple as Johnston described.

OG&E uses coal-fired generation for most of its baseload supply, the minimum amount of power used at a given time, Renfrow said. Coal power recently has been averaging about 25 percent of the price for natural-gas generation.

It is mainly on hot summer days and other peak energy usage times that the utility uses large amounts of power from natural-gas generators and other sources, said Jesse Langston, OG&E's director of corporate planning.

Langston said the company already often buys power from InterGen and numerous other sources to meet its peak demand.

"We buy whatever is cheapest," he said. "If a utility in Kansas is running a coal plant and doesn't need all of its power, we might want to buy their power. The (Corporation) Commission would not like it if we said we would buy only from independent power producers, because they complain if we don't."

He said the utility also buys the contracts hours ahead of time, not weeks or months ahead as InterGen proposed.

"If we had contracted with an IPP this summer expecting the load to be high, we would have to take our inexpensive coal plants offline to fulfill our contracts with the IPP," he said. "It's hard to predict the weather a week or more ahead of time."

The Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers recommended further study into the forced competitive bidding process. The group said industrial customers could suffer most from increased energy prices and be among the largest beneficiaries of less expensive power costs.

"If someone has a study that says the economic dispatch model and competitive bidding can provide savings, I think we need to look at that," said Thomas P. Schroedter, attorney for the Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers. "We believe Oklahoma needs to do whatever it can to promote industries locating here, economic development, expansion and job creation."

-----

To see more of The Daily Oklahoman, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.newsok.com .

(c) 2004, The Daily Oklahoman. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com.

OGE, RD, SC,