Use of Clean Coal Technologies Will Help Utilities Take the Lead in Hydrogen Economy Race, Says Thinking Energy
Sep 16 - Business Wire
Soaring prices and tight supplies of natural gas will force electric utilities in the United States to radically reconsider their fuel choices, says a new study. "There's only one choice--almost a 'no brainer'--and that is coal," concludes Thinking Energy, the energy consulting unit of The Thinking Companies, Inc. Further, by installing the latest clean coal technologies, like integrated gasification combined cycle, utilities will be uniquely positioned to take the lead in hydrogen production, thereby helping to make the hydrogen economy a reality.
"Coal is regarded as dirty, but there's no need for it to be,"
argues Shirley Strzelecki Savage, co-author of the study, Return To Coal: Why
Utilities Must Reconsider This Cheap, Plentiful Fuel. "Modern coal-fired
plans can be engineered to produce acceptably low SOx and NOx levels, and to
have much greater thermal efficiency. Developments like fluidized bed combustion
and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants have made great
technological strides, have attracted billions of dollars in R&D expense
over recent years, and are quite economically attractive compared to gas-fired
plants at today's gas price levels. Coal, on the other hand, has never been
cheaper."
Among the improvements seen by Thinking Energy are better mercury trapping
techniques, high-temperature offgas treatment, and higher operating temperatures
for boilers, all of which give coal a boost. Concerns about global warming are
common to all fossil fuels. "In fact, IGCCs produce more concentrated CO2,
the critical 'greenhouse gas,' and are more suited to future carbon
sequestration efforts," Peter Savage says.
Utilities are well-placed to take the lead in building an energy future based
on hydrogen, the report says. "There's no reason why oil (or gas) companies
have to be ceded this role. Utilities have the access to coal, and they have the
ability to burn it cleanly to make electricity. If IGCCs are eventually built in
quantity, the syngas can be used to raise electricity, or part can be diverted
to upgrading by steam reforming to make clean hydrogen fuel, almost on a 'swing'
basis, dependent on the amount of purification capacity installed. If that
happens, the electric industry will have the muscle to be the low-cost hydrogen
supplier, whether or not oil majors or refiners see the light. It's an
unrivalled ground-floor window of opportunity."
The study is dismissive of other alternatives in the short term.
"Nuclear choices aren't going to be made. The gas industry is staking its
shirt on future exploration and 'tight sands,' unproven ideas like methane
hydrates, or LNG imports. And alternatives like wind and solar power are not
ready for commercialization," the Savages argue.
For the US in particular, coal offers great advantages of economic security:
"Even if sufficient LNG import capacity is built, dare the electrical
industry and consumers risk making themselves hostage to imports, most of them
coming from OPEC countries? The US is self-sufficient in coal for the next
century, long enough for 'alternatives' to be properly developed," the
authors say. Similar arguments apply in the case of China and several other
industrial markets that have developed an unhealthy dependence on natural gas.
The $250, 238-page techno-economic study, which includes a detailed appraisal
of current and future clean coal technologies and their economics, will be
available on September 23, 2004. It's undoubtedly the most up-to-the-minute,
readable, and comprehensive study of clean coal issues available. Pre-orders can
be placed at www.thinkingenergy.com/coal.htm
, by e-mail at coalreport@thinkingenergy.com
or by calling 207-829-3223.
For further details, contact: Shirley S. Savage, President, The Thinking
Companies, Inc. at 207-829-2020.