13-02-04
Conservation groups, already upset with the Bush administration for opening
up the West to oil drilling, say the upcoming lease of more than 126,000 acres
of federal land in Utah and Colorado, including some near Dinosaur National
Monument, is further proof the administration values oil and gas over all other
resources. The Bureau of Land Management, which owns land on the southern and western
fringes of the monument, is offering several parcels of land in Colorado and
Utah to oil and gas companies for drilling leases. "Dinosaur National Monument and wilderness lands are special places that
must be protected for all Americans," said Jim DiPeso of Republicans for
Environmental Protection America. "In addition, we must have a balanced
national energy policy that emphasizes efficiency, so there is less pressure to
drill in unspoiled wild lands." The BLM offered for lease more than 45,000 acres of land in Colorado split
into 27 parcels on the south side of the monument. The Utah parcels, consisting
of 81,269 acres, will go up for lease and include land outside the western end
of the monument and other parcels of land that have wilderness qualities near
the Book Cliffs in east-central Utah. The lands offered for leases this month were listed by the BLM in 1999 as
wilderness quality lands, said Steve Bloch, staff attorney for the Southern Utah
Wilderness Alliance. Banks agreed, but said that designation doesn't mean the
land can't have other uses.
Source: Associated PressConservation groups speak out against new leases
A former Dinosaur Monument superintendent also spoke out against the leases.
"As I look more recently at the oil and gas lease offerings, frankly, I'm
shocked at the broad scale and sheer magnitude," said Denny Huffman, who
was the superintendent from 1987-1997. Huffman said the lease offerings nearly
surround the "unique resources" of the monument and future impacts
could include poor air quality, visible oil drilling rigs and light pollution
ruining clear views of the night sky.
An attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance threatened to fight the
Utah lease in court. The Utah BLM had considered nearly 200,000 for this
quarterly lease period, but withdrew almost 111,000 acres from consideration
after re-examining how that land could be affected, said Don Banks, a spokesman
with the Salt Lake City office.
"We do look at wilderness characteristics along with all the other
resources we are in charge of managing," Banks said. "We're laying out
what we're doing. The lands that should be protected will be and the lands that
should be offered for lease should be offered."
"They are considered, but they are considered alongside wildlife and energy
potential," he said.