Regulators Ok With Customer Service Quality
Mar 16 - Electric Perspectives
New research by Navigant Consulting shows that regulators are satisfied overall with customer service levels and don't necessarily need to adopt across-the-board mandatory customer service quality (CSQ) standards.
The Navigant study found that across the nation, there is little consistency
in how CSQ standards have been applied, but this is due to things like regional
and utility differences. Regulators in most states have negotiated CSQ standards
with each utility on a case-by- case basis. Moreover, in most states, regulators
are satisfied with energy utility customer service performance.
The research also revealed that some regulators view customer complaint rates
as an indicator of customer satisfaction and service quality, and most or all
regulators are highly sensitive to complaints and complaint resolution
compliance-suggesting that if customers begin to voice complaints loudly about
their utility, regulators will be more likely to take a hard look at CSQ
standards.
Another way of ensuring higher customer service performance is through
performance based ratemaking (PBR), a method not always trusted by regulators,
according to Navigant, but one that is flexible and most often favored by
industry. In fact, 19 states already have PBR rate agreements that include CSQ
standards in their utility rate plans.
Pennsylvania and New Jersey are already developing standards for mandatory
compliance by utilities. The Pennsylvania public utility commission will
introduce its model early this year-a prescriptive standard for utilities,
expected to include contact center answer time regulations. The New Jersey Board
of Public Utilities is seeking to initiate a consumer report card initiative
that measures the performance of utilities in five areas: consumer service
performance; consumer satisfaction; system reliability and safety; pricing; and
financial profiles.
The study found several barriers to implementing benchmarks.
* Regional factors such as geography, weather, distribution system
configuration, customer demographics, and differences in regulation have an
impact on performance and vary across utilities.
* Customer and regulator expectations for service quality also differ
regionally. Aligning costs, which are regulated at a state level, with a
national standard will be extremely complex.
* Establishing a consistent and transparent set of measurement and reporting
processes represents the single most problematic design challenge for regional
or national standardization of CSQ standards.
If regulators do follow a mandatory CSQ standard model in lieu of existing
models or PBR models, Navigant recommends that they be aligned, balanced,
controllable, measurable, flexible, and verifiable.
Copyright Edison Electric Institute Mar/Apr 2004