Sierra Club sues over security risks
Mar 17 - Oakland Tribune
The Sierra Club has sued the Bush administration, alleging that the federal government has failed to address security risks at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant off the Central California coast.
"The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, caused petitioners to be
gravely concerned that the siting and design of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power
plant makes it a vulnerable and attractive target for acts of malice or
insanity," according to the lawsuit.
The Sierra Club, along with the activist group San Luis Obispo Mothers for
Peace, filed the complaint Monday in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
San Francisco.
Built in 1985, the Diablo Canyon facility is owned and operated by Pacific
Gas & Electric Co., which has applied for a license to store spent
radioactive fuel in dry casks onsite because spent- fuel pools will be full
within three years.
Victor Dricks, a spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said the
agency hasn't seen the lawsuit and wouldn't comment on it directly. But the
agency has said previously that a licensing hearing isn't the appropriate venue
for addressing national security concerns, he said.
Dricks said that the agency believes the Diablo Canyon facility is secure,
adding that it has passed tests involving a mock attack force attempting to
invade the facility.
"Pacific Gas & Electric is meeting the agency's requirements for the
physical protection of that site, and they have demonstrated their ability to do
so through our numerous inspections," Dricks said.
Some experts have complained that the Bush administration hasn't done enough
to ensure security at the nation's nuclear plants since the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks.
California Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and other state and
local officials have criticized the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for not
holding hearings on vulnerabilities at the Diablo Canyon facility, and have
urged the agency to do so.
Gordon Thompson, executive director of the Institute for Resource and
Security Studies, said that "while the specific points of vulnerability
should remain confidential, public debate on this issue is essential." Copyright © 1996-2004 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.