Some residents see red over 'green' turbine plan
Jan 30 - Patriot Ledger, The; Quincy, Mass.
The proposed construction of a 120-foot-tall wind turbine on the grounds of
the new Whitman-Hanson Regional High School remains controversial for several
area residents. A meeting of the Hanson Zoning Bylaw Committee last night left
the issue unresolved. "The wind turbine will serve mainly for educational
purposes," said Jim Armstrong, chairman of the Whitman-Hanson school
building committee. "Students will be able to monitor wind speed and energy
production at computers right in their classrooms."
The turbine is expected to provide 1 percent of the school's energy needs,
but some are still not sold on the idea. "I'm not against wind turbines or
alternative energy," said Renee Smith, a resident of Catherine Road, which
is near the new school, "but it was not mentioned when we approved
construction of the high school. I feel misled and deceived."
The turbine is part of a "green building" approach to the
construction of the new school. The school received a $500,000 grant from the
state's Massachusetts Technology Collaborative under its Green Schools
Initiative. In addition to the planned turbine, the school will use
solar-powered energy cells. Devices on the roof will collect rain water, which
will be used for the school's toilets.
Armstrong said the idea for the turbine came from some of the school's
students, who conducted a feasibility study for the turbine. He believes that
opponents to the project need to put it in perspective. "People have been
comparing this to the turbine (at Pemberton Point) in Hull," Armstrong
said, "but this isn't much more than a glorified science experiment."
He added that the looming 165-foot-tall, 660-kilowatt turbine in Hull is a
far larger than the proposed 120-foot, 10-kilowatt one for the Whitman-Hanson
school grounds. Armstrong said that the turbine was not part of the original
plan for the school, which Whitman and Hanson residents overwhelmingly approved
in 2002. The new school is expected to be completed in August 2005. Armstrong
emphasized, however, that the school building committee has addressed the
concerns of area residents, specifically those on the neighboring streets of
Catherine Road, Birchbark Drive and Franklin Street. The height of the proposed
turbine has been lowered 10 to 20 feet, and a site farthest from properties on
all three streets was chosen.
Some say it's still too close.
"It's basically in my back yard. I'll have a clear view of it,"
said Darlene Sebastyn of Catherine Road. She and Smith were unconvinced by
diagrams presented at last night's meeting, which show that trees should help
block views of the turbine. "That's not going to be the case for four or
five months in the year when the trees are bare," Smith argued. Previous
concerns about noise levels were addressed at the meeting. The school building
committee determined that within a 200-foot radius, noise levels would be raised
only five decibels with no noticeable noise beyond that point. The closest
residence, on Catherine Road, is 690 feet from the proposed turbine. A final
decision on whether to allow the turbine is expected to be made at a Feb. 17
meeting of the zoning bylaw committee, when questions of safety are to be
addressed.