By Alex Kirby
22-04-04
Part of the attraction of oil for most of us has probably always been its key-turning, switch-flicking simplicity. This one substance has given us food, warmth, chemicals, medicines, clothing -- and above all mobility.
So it is natural enough for us to look for one neat and simple replacement which
will be the perfect substitute for oil in all its versatile guises. But the
harsh truth is that nothing is going to be capable of doing everything that oil
does -- not yet, perhaps never.
Saved for essentials
So planning for the fast-approaching end of the age of oil means accepting we
shall have to rely on many partial solutions rather than one big one. It means
accepting that there are some things which only oil can do, and making a
priority list of essential purposes. Drugs and farming would probably come near
the top.
Next come the various other ways of producing energy, most of them classed as
renewable in the sense that they rely on inexhaustible natural resources.
Hydropower in its traditional form has been around for a long time. It harnesses
the power of running water, as watermills have done for centuries. It is
non-polluting, but works only where there is available water: building dams is
seldom sustainable.
Wave and tidal power are newer variations which will work in countries with coastlines; both have a lot of development ahead of them. Hydrogen is often seen as the fuel of the future, and one day it may be. It is virtually limitless, as it is a constituent of water, and is non-polluting.
But it is hard to store and transport, and at the moment takes a lot of
electricity to make, either from water or from fossil fuels. Its day may come
when cheap electricity is available from solar power. Even in cloudy countries
like the UK, photovoltaic cells can provide "a power station on your
roof".
Invaluable supplements
But they cannot provide an uninterruptible supply, so will always need some
back-up, perhaps in the form of batteries. In 10 years' time PVs will probably
be competitive on cost with conventional energy.
Wind power: turbines, the modern version of the windmill, can provide useful
amounts of energy in countries with vigorous winds, like the UK. They, like
solar power, will not produce a round-the-clock supply, and often arouse local
opposition because of their noise, appearance, and threat to birds.
Biomass includes specially-grown crops like willow, and material like bagasse,
sugar-cane waste, which power stations can burn. One UK station burns chicken
droppings and the remains of cattle killed during the scare over BSE. In
developing countries scarce wood is burnt, and also animal dung needed for
fertilising the exhausted soil.
Long-term options
Geothermal energy uses the heat in the Earth's core, either from rocks and water
near the surface or through drilling deep wells. It heats most buildings in
Iceland, and is widely used in several other countries.
Ocean energy can generate electricity by using the temperature difference
between deep ocean water and surface water which has been warmed by the Sun. One
estimate says less than 0.1 % of the oceans' solar energy would supply more than
20 times the daily energy consumption of the US. But using this technology lies
a long way ahead.
Gas reserves may outlast the oil. There is plenty of coal, but little chance of
using it without adding to greenhouse gas emissions: it is a dirtier fuel than
oil. Nuclear power can deliver energy without adding to greenhouse emissions in
the process, but it has several severe handicaps. Many people oppose it because
they believe it is dangerous, and there is so far no way to dispose safely of
nuclear waste.
Mobility conundrum
There is also what is called "the fifth fuel" -- energy conservation,
using energy sparingly. Leaving TVs on standby, overfilling kettles, forgetting
to turn lights off, and unnecessary journeys all waste substantial amounts of
energy. Allied to this is energy efficiency, squeezing all the potential out of
every unit of energy, as in combined heat and power schemes. Many of these oil
substitutes are available now. Most of the rest soon will be, and at an
increasingly attractive price.
The big conundrum is transport, because many of the replacement fuels do not
lend themselves easily to use in vehicles. That apart, all it needs is for us to
realise how much we shall soon need to turn to these alternatives just to keep
the lights on.
Source: BBC News