Waterloo, Iowa,
residents oppose proposed power plant
Apr 11, 2006 - Waterloo-Cedar Falls Courier, Iowa
Author(s): Pat Kinney
Apr. 11--WATERLOO -- The City Council Monday night received a
petition with more than 600 signatures opposing a proposed power plant
in northeast Waterloo.
Betty Seamans, who lives on Independence Avenue outside the city
limits, but who is building new homes in east Waterloo, filed the
petition in opposition to LS Power's proposed massive 750-megawatt, $1.3
billion power plant east of Eagle Ottawa tannery and north of Newell
Road.
"I own property all over Waterloo, I own houses, and I don't want it
next to my city," Seamans said. "We do have a lot of property on the
east side. Our plan was to help the east side build up. I'm hoping this
won't go through because it's going to hinder us a lot. We want to help
the east side. It needs to rebuild and be productive.
"I'm going to fight this as long as I can," Seamans said of the power
plant proposal.
While many of the petition signers are from various parts of
Waterloo, they also come from all over Black Hawk County and as far away
as Lansing and Cedar Rapids. One of the signers is Kamyar Enshayan, a
Cedar Falls City Council member and an assistant professor at the Center
for Energy and Environmental Education at the University of Northern
Iowa.
The petitions are identical to the ones submitted to the Black Hawk
County Board of Supervisors in February, but contain nearly triple the
260 signatures presented then, said opponent Gail Mueller, a county
resident near Dewar and a Poyner Township trustee. He accompanied
Seamans along with Robert Hummel, who co-owns east side property with
Seamans and her husband Lowell on which new homes are being built.
Petitioners expressed concerns that the proposed power plant will
increase flooding in the unincorporated community of Dewar; create air
pollution from burning coal; and increase of traffic on Newell Street.
Mueller and Seamans also expressed concerns about long coal trains
tying up traffic in town.
The petitioners indicated they're disappointed with the Board of
Supervisors' inaction on the issue.
"It's very disappointing our county officials could tell us how much
tax dollars they were getting, but they couldn't tell us how much
pollution was coming out of this plant when it first hit," Mueller said.
"Are the tax dollars they're taking in going to offset the health risks
or health problems for the people of the east side of Waterloo?"
The petitions did not ask for a specific action from the council.
"But we will," Seamans said. While the plant requires Iowa Utilities
Board approval, a statement of opposition now by a local public body may
carry some weight with the state, they said.
Waterloo Mayor Tim Hurley supports the power plant proposal and said
LS Power officials will be holding promised community meetings soon to
provide information about the project.
Robert Colozza, project manager with LS Power, said the Iowa
Utilities Board will be conducting a public information meeting on the
project in early May.
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|