Energy and Climate 
      Crises: On a Collision Course at a Fork in the Road
      
      July 27, 2006 — By James Quigley, Center for
      
      
      
      Sustainable 
      
      Energy 
      War rages in the Middle East as 
      commodities traders wrangle over the
      
      
      
      price 
      
      of 
      
      crude 
      
      oil flowing in precarious abundance from that troubled 
      land. Motorists around the country -- and the world-- watch helplessly as
      
      
      
      prices 
      
      at 
      
      the 
      
      pump ratchet up with numbing regularity. Airline 
      executives agonize over raising ticket prices to cover soaring
      
      
      
      fuel 
      
      costs that diminish sales. Families are putting the 
      brakes on vacations that include long distance car trips. 
      
      “Disposable" income becomes less disposable as more of it is disposed on 
      fuel that hikes the price of everything that gets to market by trucks, 
      that also consume fuel to get it there, which includes almost every 
      tangible thing you can buy in this economy. Oil companies still reap huge 
      profits as they funnel more wealth to the campaign coffers of elected 
      officials who give us the best pro-oil government oil money can buy. 
      Electricity costs are going up as natural gas supplies are taxed and the 
      demand for more coal pushes its price upward. People who heat their homes 
      with fuel oil are bracing themselves for the sticker shock of the coming 
      heating season. 
      
      On a collision course with this energy crisis is the crisis of global 
      climate change. Melting glaciers and receding polar ice shelves are 
      delivering new supplies of fresh water to the oceans on a Biblical scale. 
      Sea level is rising, both from the melting ice and thermal expansion as 
      surface temperature increases. More violent storms are brewing as drought 
      wreaks havoc with wildfires in the West and excessive rainfall floods out 
      scores of towns in the East. A heat wave scorches the country and sets off 
      power outages as the demand for air conditioning overloads the electric 
      grid. Although the warming is tied to more carbon dioxide in the 
      atmosphere, human activity now pumps more carbon dioxide into the 
      atmosphere than ever before. 
      
      Here's the rub: if carbon dioxide should be avoided, then we must find a 
      way to remove the carbon from these fuels (oil, coal, etc.) and 
      "sequester" it before it enters the atmosphere, which may be technically 
      possible but almost certainly economically and socially improbable, or, 
      discontinue its use and replace it with non-carbon energy production. This 
      fork in the road is fraught with peril. Down one side is nuclear power 
      that while avoiding the carbon problem encounters the radioactive waste 
      problem, which some would have us believe is solved by a nuclear waste 
      dump called Yucca Mountain in Nevada, where, it is believed, nuclear waste 
      will sit unmolested in perpetuity, but the well-known geological history 
      of the Earth tells us it will not, as does the ethos of terrorism that now 
      so abounds in global society. So who are we kidding here? And can nuke 
      proponents guarantee there will never be another Three-Mile Island or 
      Chernobyl? The insurance industry is decidedly unwilling to take that 
      chance. 
      
      Down the other fork in the road is renewable energy, virtually 
      inexhaustible, at least until the Sun burns itself out. It is common 
      knowledge that as much as ten-thousand times more solar energy falls on 
      the Earth’s surface each day as is used in all daily human activity. With 
      existing, off-the-shelf solar photovoltaic (sunlight-to-electricity) 
      technology operating at a mere 10% efficiency on only 10% of the land mass 
      of Arizona, we could provide for all of the country's electrical power 
      demand. We could accomplish the same end by turning Minnesota into a wind 
      farm with existing wind-to-electric technology. It is not suggested here 
      that we do either to Arizona or Minnesota. The point is that we could 
      distribute this generation capacity throughout the land, putting people to 
      work in a sustainable economy, have a surplus of power to produce hydrogen 
      to propel motor vehicles down the nation’s highway spewing nothing more 
      than water vapor, free ourselves from the violent chemistry of fossil 
      fuels and the social violence it spawns as we grow increasingly desperate 
      to secure it against the demands of others, and in the process, save 
      ourselves from the terrible fate awaiting the human race and most of the 
      other living creatures on the planet if we continue to do nothing about 
      global climate change. 
      
      What is needed now more than ever is a public that is awakened from its 
      complacency and leadership that has enough vision to overcome the 
      seduction of powerful interests who are blinded by their own preoccupation 
      with the global extraction and delivery of fossil fuels. This country that 
      undertook massive public works projects like putting a man on the moon, or 
      building the interstate highway system, and became the most vital economy 
      of all time, has a choice of either fading into oblivion, or correcting 
      the course of human history. We can do it. We should, or at least die 
      trying. 
      
      
      
      Contact Info: 
      
      Website : 
      
      
      Read All Stories by James Quigley, Center for Sustainable Energy