By Shihoko Goto
UPI Senior Business Correspondent
Aug. 16, 2006 at 3:38PM
Can paying more for gas make people use less of it?
That's certainly what the Chinese government is hoping for as
it considers opening up its oil market. Earlier this week, local
media reports said that the world's second-largest oil-consuming
nation is considering easing price control on its energy markets in
an attempt to get consumers to use less oil and electricity.
"We will allow the scarcity of resources to determine their
price ... that's the basic principle of the price reforms," said Bi
Jingquan, vice minister of price reform at the National Development
and Reform Commission, in a speech to policymakers last week,
according to the People's Daily. He said that "the proposed price
reform is in an effort to cut widespread waste of natural resources
due to low prices," though he noted there was still no indication
about how much the prices might change.
He did acknowledge, however, that while liberalization would
mean higher prices, the government was determined to make prices
better reflect market forces, adding that the government would
consider offering subsidies "to lessen the impact on disadvantaged
groups."
In the near-term, though, China's priority is to use less
energy even as its economy continues to expand rapidly. The
government had been planning to reduce energy consumption by 4
percent in relation to GDP by the end of this year, yet consumption
actually nudged up 0.8 percent during the first six months of this
year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.
While domestically produced coal continues to provide for the
bulk of the country's energy needs, there have been growing concerns
about how environmentally destructive mining for and burning up the
fuel can be, in addition to it being particularly harmful to health.
The shift toward using gasoline as well as electricity has thus
intensified, but given that most oil in China is imported, it makes
particularly good economic sense to wean the country off from too
heavy a dependency on oil.
The move to deregulate the energy market and push up prices
should certainly bring about the desired effect, but it would likely
take some time for the policy to make any significant impact on
reducing China's oil consumption, said Jerry Taylor, senior fellow
at the libertarian Cato Institute, a Washington think tank.
"In the short run, consumers respond sluggishly to oil price
changes," Taylor said. He said that a 10 percent decline in oil
costs from present levels would only decrease consumption by
four-tenth of 1 percent to 1 percent over the course of a couple of
years. Over the longer term, however, a 10 percent decrease in
energy prices could lead to a reduction in consumption by as much as
10 percent, Taylor said.
"So it's better (for the Chinese government) to go ahead" with
opening up to market prices, so long as it accepts the fact that
that alone will not lead to a significant reduction in the country's
energy needs. Taylor also pointed out that given that the current
electricity system in China is poorly maintained and susceptible to
breakdowns, heavy investments have been made in back-up energy
generation, including diesel. By making energy more costly, there
would be a bigger incentive for electricity grids to become more
stable and thus reduce the demand for oil products.
Still, it seems unlikely China will meet its own target of
reducing energy use this year. On Wednesday, the Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries reported that while global demand for
petroleum has been revised down by 80,000 barrels a day to 1.3
million barrels per day, demand in China was revised up by 40,000
barrels per day "due to unexpected strong demand in the second
quarter."
China's appetite for oil is anticipated to remain just as
strong next year as well, according to OPEC's latest monthly report,
as the cartel said "in 2007, world oil demand growth is forecast at
1.3 million bpd or 1.5 percent, unchanged from the previous month,
with China and the Middle East expected to be the leading growth
regions."
Copyright © 2006 The Washington Times, LLC To subscribe or visit go to: http://washingtontimes.com