U.S. agency cautions against uncontrolled growth of green fuel

SIOUX CENTER, Iowa, US, August 16, 2006 (Refocus Weekly)

There is potential for “unintended adverse environmental impacts” if the United Sates increases production of biofuels without adoption of “appropriate conservation practices,” according to an analysis released by the federal secretary of agriculture.

“Corn production may expand into environmentally sensitive areas and the excess removal of biomass for cellulosic ethanol production may adversely affect soil quality,” warns an analysis prepared by USDA and released by secretary Mike Johanns. The analysis of the department's renewable energy programs is the fourth in a series of subject areas that received a comprehensive examination by USDA.

During a series of national consultations last year (Farm Bill Forums), “we heard real enthusiasm from producers about the potential for agriculture to unleash new sources of energy and income,” says Johanns. “We have seen ethanol production more than double in four years. USDA is committed to encouraging the entrepreneurial innovation of America's farmers and ranchers to help build a new energy economy.”

The paper looks at all potential sources of energy from agriculture, ranging from farm fields to pasture and forest lands, and tracks the results of USDA's renewable energy programs and suggests enhancements which are suggested for public discussion. In March, Johanns announced the release of 41 papers summarizing the 4,000 comments received during 52 sessions, and the first three theme papers covered risk management, conservation & the environment, and rural development.

A number of possible expansions of direct market intervention are suggested in the report, including an increase in the level of the Renewable Fuel Standard because biofuel production currently exceeds the renewable fuels required under the RFS, and the standard is not expected to be binding and provides little incentive to produce additional biofuels. The RFS could be raised to provide a greater production incentive, or the cellulosic requirement under the RFS could be expanded and accelerated to begin before 2012, it suggests.

Another suggestion is to extend renewable energy tax credits to 2015 or later, to reduce investment uncertainty created by the current expiration dates of 2008 and 2010. Biofuel tax credits could be reduced when they are not effective in increasing biofuel supply or are not needed, and this change would avoid excessive use of credits and save federal budget resources by making credits variable.

The government could provide accelerated depreciation on renewable energy equipment and facility investment, and this preferential tax treatment could spur new investment in specialized production, handling and processing facilities for biofuels. It could also provide a depreciation allowance on lands where wind, solar or geothermal generation development occurs, similar to the depletion allowance for the oil industry.

Another suggestion is to use more land enrolled in the CRP for biomass harvesting and wind energy. CRP land was used for pilot programs in the 1990s when farmers were allowed to harvest biomass for energy use with a reduced rental rate, it explains, and the 2002 Farm Bill allows USDA to permit the managed harvesting of biomass and the installation of wind turbines, consistent with the conservation of soil, water, water quality, and wildlife habitat.

“Agriculture is a major user of energy, with direct energy consumption and indirect energy use through production inputs, such as fertilizer, accounting 15% of total farm cash production expenses,” the report explains. “Agriculture has the potential to become an increasingly important source of renewable energy and provide significant economic opportunities for farmers and ranchers.”

“Renewable energy production stimulates the agricultural and rural economy, improves the environment, and enhances national energy security,” it continues. “The most effective government policies that have expanded renewable energy production are non-agricultural policies and the paper discusses recent trends in energy use in agriculture, renewable energy production opportunities, policies that have helped foster those opportunities, and the prospects for renewable energy markets.


Click here for more info

Visit http://www.sparksdata.co.uk/refocus/ for your international energy focus!!

Refocus © Copyright 2005, Elsevier Ltd, All rights reserved.