Hurricanes dominated the news last summer. Ice storms
will do so this winter. But what are utilities doing to
enhance their outage management systems and to ensure that
their disaster response efforts are cost efficient?
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Beefing up response times makes good sense. Such
systems can pay for themselves in a relatively short
period while customer satisfaction will rise if their
power is restored faster. Most utilities understand the
need to increase productivity and decrease costs as well
as have a workforce that can share knowledge and work more
efficiently. By installing or upgrading their outage
management systems, utilities could augment their
competitiveness.
According to Energy Central's research and analysis
division that conducted a survey of utility executives in
November 2005, utilities plan to spend upwards of $3
billion on all information technology systems. That ranges
from enterprise resource management systems to outage
management systems. The things holding companies back
include such factors as the complexity of integrating
disparate systems to the need to focus on pressing issues
like controlling the underlying cost of fuel.
Meantime, the costs are still accruing from Hurricanes
Katrina and Wilma. No doubt, the price of restoration can
add up. And in the midst of the fracas, utilities can pay
a lot more for services because they are in a rush to get
back to normal. But such haste can prove expensive. That's
why some utilities are turning to automated services to
handle all essential services, including those tied to
outage management and disaster response.
Such software can handle all requests for proposals
where prospective vendors can submit their bids while any
subsequent delivery of goods and services is properly
managed. In essence, any accepted bids are controlled and
if billing deviates from a previously agreed upon price,
it is flagged for review.
Those software systems work for both planned and
unplanned events. During a hurricane, for example,
suppliers will go on line and fill out a form and explain
what they have done. Contractors are paid in a timely and
accurate manner.
Entergy Corp. had such a system in place a full year
before Hurricane Katrina struck. "Entergy had been getting
boxes of invoices that they had to manually reconcile,"
says Melisa Liberman, a vice president for IQNavigator,
which works with the utility on these issues. "Because it
had been trying to process those invoices so quickly, it
paid above the normal rates -- even for movies that
contractors watched in their hotels."
When the lights go out in Colorado Springs Utility's
territory, it says that it will be there to fix the
problem in 30 minutes. And because the municipal utility
is trying to increase its name recognition and demonstrate
the value of having a power company that is locally-owned,
the enhanced service will be a great asset, it says
All told, the company says that response times are
about 40 percent faster, enabling the company to meet its
30-minute time frame objective. It's about making sure
that customer service agents get the right information and
are able to tell callers precisely where the outage has
occurred and when it will be remedied.
Fancy Equipment
Fancy equipment like satellite systems can pinpoint
exactly where problems are and show field personnel not
only directions but also what inventories are necessary to
have with them. The old system of having agents take
information and sort it by hand before it is relayed to
crews is inefficient -- and costly, since it involves a
lot of overtime.
Toward that end, utilities might expect a pay back on
such sophisticated systems within three to seven years,
all on an initial investment of between $500,000 and $5
million, say experts who follow these things. The size of
the investment depends on how big the utility is, how many
modules must be used and what equipment is necessary to
make the system run. The return, of course, depends on how
many storms ravage an area and how much is saved by
getting folks back on line quicker.
In the case of Colorado Springs Utility, it says that
it will be better able to allocate its resources because
of the outage management system. Instead of channeling
money to fix a whole circuit, the satellite system can
narrow where the problem is occurring -- thus the fix is
quicker and cheaper.
Similarly, Allegheny Energy is enhancing its outage
management and work management technologies by having such
blackouts reported to a centralized office. That center
not only keeps customers informed but also provides crews
precise details about where such outages have occurred.
Its work management system functions in a similar
fashion. Basically, customer information is now in the
hands of crews, who have access to detailed maps and
customer histories. The aim of the technology is to
decentralize information so that customers can be served
faster. If, for instance, a storm ravages parts of
Allegheny's territory, it can cull field personnel from
other areas and equip them with the tools necessary to
make them effective at their jobs.
Key Tools
Public Service of New Mexico also wanted to become
customer centric. In 1994, its customer ratings dropped by
10 percent. It responded by creating an outage management
system that was implemented in 1998. The investment has
paid off. Not only are customers happy but the technology
paid for itself within three years, namely through a
dramatic reduction in restoration times and overtime
costs.
Instead of customer service agents merely recording
where outages have occurred, they can now relay them to
the outage center and provide customers with an estimate
of when their power will be back on. Such technology,
replete with automated mapping, arms crews with precise
directions and customer histories.
One of the key tools to effectively manage resources is
having the right hardware and software. Oftentimes
disasters require the needs of hundreds of workers outside
a given area, and they are unfamiliar with the
surroundings and the infrastructure. They don't just need
maps. They need an inventory of the assets in a given
area, or how many transformers and poles as well as how
much wiring. The goal is to increase response times and by
extension, customer satisfaction.
"In the past, utilities used computer-generated maps in
the engineering offices," says Marty Osborn, vice
president of product strategy for software developer
Datastream. "Now, all this information can be stored on a
computer and people all over have access."
Utilities can't control the weather. But they can
manage their responses. Today, many of those companies are
finding success with the latest outage management and work
flow systems.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|