MISO wants Calpine excluded from market if cash rules aren't met

Calpine on the Brink

The Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator on Jan 12 asked a US Bankruptcy Court to order Calpine Corp to comply with the grid operator's cash collateral and credit assurance requirements or permit MISO to bar the merchant generator from participating in its market after Jan 20.

In a filing with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, MISO argued that the court's Dec 21 interim order, which would allow the merchant generator to provide the regional transmission organization with a deposit equal to two weeks of utility service, calculated as a historical average of the past 12 months, falls far short of what MISO requires of its market participants and could force other market players to bear the costs of a Calpine default.

Calpine is attempting to use bankruptcy "to force the Midwest ISO to continue to open its markets to the [company] while simultaneously attempting to fundamentally amend the payment obligations set forth in the executory contracts that govern the relationship among [Calpine], the Midwest ISO and other participants," the grid operator told the court.

"In short, the debtor is proposing a post-petition breach of its payment assurance obligations required under the executory contracts, but yet still receive the benefits" of those contracts.

In addition, MISO said the two-week deposit is particularly inadequate given that since April 2005, Calpine has been buying and selling energy in the RTO's day-ahead and real-time energy markets, transactions that MISO said "involve substantially more dollars [than transmission services] and expose" it to "greater risk in the event of default."

MISO said that under the terms of the interim order, it would be prevented from requiring Calpine to increase its collateral, if the company were, as it did in October and November, to switch from a net seller to a net buyer of energy.

"The effect of the proposal may force Midwest ISO to extend millions of dollars of unsecured credit to the debtor on terms and conditions not available to other market participants," it said.

Such a result, MISO continued, is not permitted under the bankruptcy code nor under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order 888, which requires equal treatment of all market participants.

Further, MISO argued, Calpine's request to substitute existing credit and collateral requirements with the two-week deposit is illegal under changes Congress approved to the bankruptcy law in 2005.

Those changes, the RTO told the court, require Calpine to provide adequate assurance of payment that is "satisfactory" to the Midwest ISO within 30 days of the petition date.

If Calpine fails to do so, then MISO "has the absolute right to terminate service."

Jan 13, 2005

Copyright © 2005 - Platts

Please visit:  www.platts.com

Their coverage of energy matters is extensive!!.