Duke Energy is following through on its promise to
sell its unregulated power generation assets. It has
agreed to sell most of its so-called merchant generation
plants to LS Power Equity Partners for about $1.54
billion.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Companies in a position to buy have solid balance
sheets in addition to an expectation that the demand for
power will increase and soak up unused electricity
capacity offered by merchant power plants. And if they can
purchase power plants at bargain prices, the assets will
likely generate greater returns. Dominion Resources,
Entergy Corp. and Exelon Corp., for example, have said
they are looking to buy good assets on the cheap while the
investment banks are doing the same.
"Now is a good time to sell," says John Reed, CEO of
Concentric Energy Advisors outside Boston that is a
financial advisory and management consultancy that works
exclusively in the energy sector. "It's always difficult
to label something as the best time to sell. But, the
market is getting comfortable with merchant risks. The
ripple effect caused by Enron has worked itself out."
Reed goes on to add that the excess capacity -- the
amount of power the merchant facilities could be selling
but are not -- will dissipate in some parts of the country
within two years. Regions such as New England, New York
and California are just about primed for new generation,
while other regions have an overabundance of generation
that will take as long as 10 years to absorb, he adds.
In the case of North Carolina-based Duke, it plans to
sell outright six power plants and parts of two others,
all to LS Power Equity and for about a $330 million
pre-tax gain. The natural gas-fired plants generate about
6,200 megawatts. The facilities for sale are located in
Arizona, California, Connecticut and Maine. LS Power has
said that the price is right and that it expects demand
for power to grow -- making the investments attractive.
"Completing the exit from (Duke's merchant) business is
a major object for 2006," says Paul Anderson, CEO of Duke,
in a formal statement.
To win the hearts of bankers, deals must focus on
improving cash flows and liquidity, as well as demonstrate
a clear path to where the utility wants to go in the
future. But the merchant generation market, per se, has
been one of the most problematic.
Rosy forecasts in the late 1990s led to a boom in the
power industry that in hindsight was not sustainable. The
result was that many lenders overvalued the collateral on
which they loaned capital, which allowed unregulated
merchants to borrow aggressively -- expenses that they
could not pass through to ratepayers. The totality of that
strategy has yet to be fully realized given the total
merchant debt is $65 billion, due by 2012.
Highest Flyers
The history of the merchant sector has been told: The
highest flying companies in the 1990s have crashed and
include not just Enron but also Mirant and Calpine, which
expect to emerge from bankruptcy as healthier enterprises.
Others such as NRG Energy have already gotten a second
wind.
Certainly, few of the generating assets that have been
taken over by lenders are current on their debt
obligations. But, the banks are taking the long view and
holding on to these facilities with the expectation that
the demand for power will escalate and the prices they can
fetch for the plants will increase.
According to Concentric's Reed, the risk profile
associated with the merchant energy sector has improved.
Indeed, many analysts expected both the merchants and the
banks to cut and run - to sell distressed assets at fire
sale prices. That has not happened. They have stepped back
and are determined to let the excess capacity work itself
out, he says.
Duke chose to sell off its plants because it decided it
did not want to be in the merchant business. Its deep
pockets permitted it to hold on to these plants and to
sell at prices it deemed reasonable -- not the 20 cents on
the dollar that buyers had initially sought for merchant
assets in general. It's the same exercise in patience that
lenders have successfully followed.
"Lenders now recognize the cyclical nature of power
generation and they recognize just how susceptible to fuel
prices these facilities can be," Reed says. "In the
future, they are looking at several scenarios so that they
can have a high comfort level that borrowers can meet
their debt service even in bad markets."
When asked about what bankrupt merchants such as
Calpine or Mirant will do with their distressed assets,
Reed said that the same rules apply whether a company is
in Chapter 11 or whether they are normally healthy. A
company in bankruptcy has been given "breathing room" by
the courts to get their affairs in order, enabling them to
avoid selling off a wave of assets.
If creditors want to get paid, they will need to ensure
that the assets of distressed companies are fully
productive and bringing in cash. When the market for
wholesale electricity rebounds, those assets will then
operate at or near capacity and their values will
subsequently increase. As such, bondholders and banks are
more likely to get repaid a higher percentage of their
loans. If the demand for power resumes, power prices and
company revenues can remain stable or increase.
Stronger Balance Sheets
At the same time, low interest rates are allowing
unregulated utility operations a chance to secure new
financing. The new maturity dates are at least four years
away, buying the enterprises time to take part in a
potential robust recovery. Reliant Resources has
refinanced $5.9 billion in bank loans, for example, while
Allegheny Energy has re-financed $1.55 billion of debt.
"The credit recovery that has been in progress for the
last three years since the credit meltdown of the power
and gas sector in late 2002 appears to have run its
course," says Fitch Ratings, in a new report. "Most
companies in the sector that suffered credit deterioration
have repaired their balance sheets or are far along ...,"
it adds, noting that high commodity prices and regulatory
risks may undermine those efforts.
While the turnaround may have begun, there are lessons
to be learned. Banks and bondholders that financed the
unregulated projects won't get swept into any new frenzy
and will scrutinize capital projects more intensely than
they did in the 1990s. That will make it more difficult to
raise capital because the credit standards will be a lot
tougher.
Merchants have also learned hard lessons. Many have
seen their credit ratings plummet as a result of
overbuilding generation and taking on too much debt. The
declaration of bankruptcy or taking advantage of
low-interest rates have allowed many unregulated power
generators to strengthen their financials, participate in
an improving economy and perhaps see the value of their
assets jump. Creditors and lenders appear willing to give
some troubled utility operations a second chance.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|