Canada's energy security is threatened. The throbbing
heat last summer along with the fallout from Hurricane
Katrina constrained its limited resources and prompted it
to buy much more power from the United States.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
The government can't afford to subsidize electricity
prices. Now, the province of Ontario announced it will
have to raise rates 15-25 percent to cover the shortfalls.
The hikes began on May 1 and are destined to increase even
more in the coming years. Meantime, concerns mount that
the city of Toronto risks energy shortages unless 5,000
megawatts of new power generation is built by 2010 and
energy conservation is maximized. At the same time, power
lines are congested while the government there has vowed
to phase out coal generation that makes up a fifth of
Ontario's fuel mix.
"Our government is providing leadership and taking
decisive action to keep the lights on in Toronto through a
combination of conservation and clean electricity supply,"
says Donna Cansfield, energy minister for the province.
Beyond the building of new generation, the government
there is working towards the immediate development of 300
megawatts of conservation and demand response, which uses
signals to let users know when power is at a premium.
The Ontario Power Authority (OPA) has said that
Ontario's stated goal of phasing out its existing coal
plants by 2009 would result in massive energy shortages.
The province's energy issues are compounded even further
because of its aging nuclear fleet, which along with hydro
power provides more than half of its energy needs. The
power authority has suggested that the province refurbish
or replace almost all of its nuclear stock of 12 power
plants at a cost of $18-$30 (U.S) billion.
It also recommends that Ontario install wind, solar and
biomass projects. Altogether, the use of renewables would
rise from 23 percent today -- that includes hydro sources
-- to 43 perrcent by 2025. The power authority warns that
indecision and complacency when it comes to implementing a
holistic solution could amount to 24,000 megawatts by 2025
-- 80 percent of the province's current capacity.
The culmination of short term problems and long term
issues is taking form now. Most citizens of the Canadian
province pay regulated rates and are largely oblivious to
supply and demand curves. But that all changes this month,
when customers' rates per kilowatt-hour go up and
particularly during the summer. To deal with this, about a
quarter of all residents have decided to buy long-term
power contracts from alternative suppliers that lock-in
rates. If the price of electricity continues to rise, they
would have made a good decision. But, if the cost of power
falls, then they did not.
Energy Blueprint
In the 1990s, Ontario's then-Conservative government
attempted some free market reforms that didn't pan out as
expected. A combination of events caused that, although
cost overruns at various generating facilities are the
primary culprits. In the end, the issue caused the
province's former premier, Ernie Eves, to lose to Liberal
Premier Dalton McGuinty in an election held in 2003.
McGuinty's government has developed a new energy
blueprint. A major thrust of it permits private producers
to sell wholesale electrical power at market prices.
Consumers, meanwhile, can lock in prices by buying
long-term fixed contracts from private suppliers. But,
overall rates are not expected to rise as fast because the
nuclear and hydro generation plants will remain regulated.
Regulators there would "blend" the regulated and an
unregulated component to come up with rates -- a solution
that some call half-baked.
Nuclear power may be the viable option for Ontario,
McGuinty said just recently. He has long argued that
nuclear energy is clean, affordable and reliable while
acknowledging that there is no perfect solution to fixing
the province's energy dilemma. Nuclear waste is an issue,
he says, but it can be contained. At the same time, he
adds that natural gas is too expensive, wind is too
intermittent and coal is too dirty.
"There is nothing that is neat and tidy by way of a
solution to our energy challenges," McGuinty said at a
press conference. "But I think we should look at our
particular history in this country" as it relates to
nuclear safety and Ontario's 30 years experience with the
fuel source, he adds.
Despite the premier's insistence that coal is filthy,
he does recognize that the goal of ditching coal-fired
plants by 2008 won't happen. In fact, his critics have
said that the very notion of doing away with cheap and
plentiful resources when there is a pending energy
shortage has worked to push up electricity rates.
In any event, there may ultimately be a meeting of the
minds on this issue. That is, at least two of the
province's coal plants are considered "clean coal"
facilities that have the latest pollution control
technologies. New laws could be made that mandate any
future development of coal resources would have to be
equipped with all the modern gadgetry to minimize
emissions.
Meantime, the McGuinty government has introduced a
green power standard to require generators there to secure
an additional one percent of their electrical needs for
eight years from wind, solar, hydro and biomass beginning
in 2006. The region has ample land mass and its wind and
water sources are also plentiful, all of which will serve
to improve air quality and provide the fuel to meet its
objectives, the government says. The goal is to boost the
use of renewable energy to 5 percent by 2007 and 10
percent by 2010.
"Ontarians need a reliable power system that doesn't
leave a legacy of economic or environmental debt," says
David Suzuki, who runs an environmental foundation there.
In the heat of political campaigns, it's tempting to
advocate simple solutions to complex problems. But, when
it comes to fixing Ontario's looming problems, there are
no easy answers. The province needs a diversity of fuel
mixes to meet its future energy needs. And it needs a
system in place to allow new supplies to come to market in
an expeditious way. While certain interest groups might
begrudge compromise, responsible leadership is about doing
the greatest good for the greatest number.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|