Greenpeace Report
Warns Commonly Found Chemicals May Be Harming Reproductive Health
May 03, 2006 — By Arthur Max, Associated Press
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands — Greenpeace
pushed Tuesday for EU legislation for tougher regulation of the
chemicals industry, warning that not enough has been done to test the
effect of chemicals found in consumer products -- from cosmetics to
computers -- on human reproductive health.
The environmental group urged the European Parliament to require
companies to replace toxic chemicals where alternatives exist, and to
periodically review authorization of other chemicals that could be
dangerous.
The recommendations came as Greenpeace published a report citing
scientific research linking declining fertility rates and reproductive
disorders in Europe in the last 50 years to the development of tens of
thousands of new chemicals used in a vast range household products.
David Santillo, a Greenpeace biologist who co-authored the report, said
possible links between sexual problems, like steadily falling sperm
counts, and exposure to certain chemicals have been studied since World
War II.
The report, entitled "Fragile: Our Reproductive Health and Chemical
Exposure," pulls together "various pieces of evidence from various
scientific publications that are in no way linked to Greenpeace,"
Santillo said.
The report came as the European Parliament was discussing legislation on
tightening the regulation of chemicals for the 25-country European
Union.
Greenpeace said the draft law has been steadily watered down in the
protection it would offer. A decision on the law, known by the acronym
REACH for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals, is due
by the end of the year.
"Right now the burden is on the governments to do the research. This law
would help shift the burden to industry," said Helen Perivier, who heads
the Greenpeace campaign against toxic materials.
"Most people assume that products have already been screened for health
and safety. That's just not true," she said.
The chemical link to reproductive problems cannot be 100 percent proved,
Santillo said, but the evidence of the link was growing stronger.
The report acknowledged several problems in the research, including the
fact that no human control group is available since everyone is exposed
to suspect chemicals, even in the womb. Lifestyle, smoking, diet and
shifting demographics also could be factors, it said.
Laboratory tests on animals reinforce suspicions of the harmful effects
on humans, but they study isolated chemicals rather than the cocktail
that is ever present in normal Western life. Also, the effect of
exposure at an early age may not become apparent for years, or even
decades.
Chemicals that are believed to affect hormones or mimic female hormones
are found in food wrappings, plastic goods and perfumes. Insulation used
in computers, televisions and mobile phones to safeguard against fire
can leak into household dust, and has caused birth defects in rats in
laboratory experiments.
Plastic prints sewn onto children's pajamas have been found to contain
alkylphnols, which lab tests indicate may interfere with sperm
production, and have been taken off the shelves of some department
stores, said Perivier, speaking from Brussels.
One 1992 study cited in the report showed that sperm count fell 50
percent between 1940 and 1990, while the incidence of testicular cancer
progressively rose. Infertility today affects 15-20 percent of couples,
compared with 7-8 percent in the early 1960s, the report said.
"On average, a typical Western man produces half the sperm his father or
grandfather did," it said.
The exposure to toxic chemicals begins before birth and can be
especially damaging in the years of infancy and childhood when the body
is in its most complex and sensitive stage of development, said the
report.
"Some 70,000 to 100,000 chemicals are in use today and we lack the basic
information on most of those chemicals," said Perivier. "Only 150
chemicals have been looked at for risk assessment."
Source: Associated Press
|