Good service and utilities are almost synonymous with
one another. But the question of how to oversee
reliability has haunted the industry, particularly since
the August 2003 blackout that affected the eastern United
States and parts of Canada.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
It’s been largely a voluntary process monitored by the
North American Electric Reliability Council. And the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission just said that such
standards provide a “solid foundation” from which to build
a more effective mandatory regulatory regime -- something
that the Energy Policy Act of 2005 demands that it do.
Already, federal regulators have identified shortcomings
in voluntary standards that include ambiguous rules and
varying degrees of compliance.
The first step toward building a modern infrastructure
is the establishment of a so-called Electric Reliability
Organization, which will seek to ensure that all entities
comply with new reliability standards. Toward that end,
the organization will propose new rules for the full
commission to review as well as resolve any
inconsistencies in state and federal laws. It will also
mediate all disputes in an expeditious manner.
It “may direct violators to comply with the standards
or impose penalties for violations, subject to review by,
and appeal to, the commission,” says John Moot, general
counsel to FERC, in recent congressional testimony.
The 2005 energy law now extends authority to federal
regulators to require not just system upgrades but also
new transmission development. The U.S. Department of
Energy now will be able to identify "national interest
electric corridors" while the FERC can site those projects
that fail to win state approval. Meantime, North American
Electric Reliability Council will have more teeth, not
just developing new standards but helping to enforce them
as well.
The idea is that the permitting process would take no
more than one year. Legal logjams could be broken by
federal regulators, at least in theory. But, FERC has
similar rights when it comes to permitting natural gas
pipelines. And, oftentimes, the process is still mired in
court fights and regulatory battles that are time
consuming. In any event, FERC emphasizes that the
permitting process will always remain open and inclusive.
Any effect so far? PECO will be investing $215 million
in about 200 local reliability projects in its
southeastern Pennsylvania domain, which it says will build
upon its record. Such investments have already led to a
decrease in the duration of outages for all customers for
three years running, with nearly a 10 percent decrease in
the length of outages last year. The shorter outage
duration results from the increased deployment of
technology on distribution circuits, better tools for
dispatching field forces and improved response time by
field personnel.
“Our customers count on us to keep the lights on and
the natural gas flowing, no matter if it's 90 degrees or 9
degrees outside," said Denis O'Brien, PECO president.
“That is a responsibility that we take very seriously.
These investments enable us to keep those promises and
deliver quality service to our customers.”
Fast Change
The regulatory changes could not come fast enough.
Transmission investment has declined in real terms --
adjusted for inflation -- from 1975 to 1998. While there
have been increases since 1998, FERC says that the level
is still less than what was invested in 1975. Over the
same time period, however, the demand for electricity has
doubled. That's resulted in a significant decrease in
transmission capacity, requiring new lines get built.
Beyond the transition to mandatory reliability
standards, the FERC has established incentive-based rates
that it says will enhance reliability and cut the cost of
delivering power because there would be less congestion.
The incentives apply to traditional utilities and to
transcos, or those that operate transmission lines but do
not own any generation.
The measures are needed. Transmission projects are
costly and take too long to get built, forcing investors
to put their capital where it can earn superior and faster
returns. That’s why the commission would authorize a
greater rate of return on these regulated assets as well
as recovery of accumulated deferred income taxes. It would
also allow companies to recover transmission-related
construction costs and provide higher rates of return for
utilities that join regional transmission organizations
that are independent and schedule all power deliveries for
participating utilities.
The incentives are already taking root. Pepco has
proposed the construction of a new 500-kilovolt
transmission line at a cost of $1.2 billion. The possible
230-mile line will cross through Virginia, Maryland and
New Jersey and would take eight years to build.
Pepco is part of the PJM Interconnection, a regional
transmission organization that plans to increase
transmission capacity throughout its eastern territory.
With summer approaching, PJM says that it is in tip-top
shape and expects to have 165,303 megawatts of generating
capacity on line to meet a peak demand of about 132,000
megawatts. That equates to a reserve margin of 25.8
percent -- well above the 15 percent “cushion” PJM
requires for reliability.
"Additional capacity and recent investments in
transmission upgrades, particularly in the congested
Baltimore and Washington areas, have strengthened
reliability,” says Audrey Zibelman, PJM's chief operating
officer. “Nevertheless, future reliability requires the
addition of resources in some areas.” To get there, PJM
has expanded its long-term planning horizon to 15 years to
better anticipate the supply and demand outlook.
Looking Forward
Meantime, the Northwest Power Conservation Council and
the Bonneville Power Administration have just adopted
regional reliability standards that they expect will avert
rolling blackouts like those experienced in 2001. The goal
is to better predict supply and demand as well as preserve
energy resources from hydro-powered generators during
plentiful times.
It’s the trend toward longer-term planning that FERC
and other industry leaders are pushing. The ultimate aim
is to build a transmission infrastructure in line with the
digital economy. Palo Alto-based EPRI, for example, is
designing an “IntelliGrid” that can predict power problems
before they happen by integrating weather data into
sensors embedded on the grid. That way, system operators
can send signals to users to curtail demand or to firms
operating distributed generators to supply new power.
“The intelligent grid will come from the gradual
confluence of innovative projects undertaken by individual
companies,” says a feature story in the EPRI Journal.
Billions, obviously, are required to get there -- money
that EPRI says is worth every penny because it would avoid
costly outages and create a modern-day grid.
Reliability has long been taken for granted. But
disruptive blackouts have prompted federal lawmakers to
give regulators more authority, all to help ease congested
lines and the rigors of a time-consuming permitting
process. It’s a step beyond voluntary standards that U.S.
lawmakers said were out-of-date with today’s needs. Now,
it’s up to FERC and other industry participants to
implement mandatory standards that could add greater
certainties and bring innovative projects to the fore.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|