Study of U.S. Power Company
Air Emissions Has Good News, Bad News
Source:
GreenBiz.com
WASHINGTON, April 6, 2006 - A new report
evaluating air pollution trends among the 100 largest electric power
producers in the U.S. shows that emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and
nitrogen oxides (NOx) have fallen markedly in recent years, but carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions increased and will likely spike in coming years.
Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power
Producers in the United States 2004 (PDF)
was released by the Ceres
investor coalition, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
and the Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PSEG), one of the electric
power generation companies included in the report.
The report, which focused on companies generating 88% of the nation's
electricity, found that overall emissions of SO2 and NOx fell by 44% and
36%, respectively, between 1990 and 2004. The drops are largely the
result of stricter pollution-control standards enacted in the 1990 Clean
Air Act amendments.
Conversely, CO2 emissions rose 27% in the same 14-year period. And the
report predicts a bigger increase in the years ahead due to an
unprecedented surge of new U.S. coal-plant proposals that would emit
substantially more CO2 than other sources generating the same amount of
power. There are currently more than 130 new coal plants proposed across
the U.S., and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects a 66%
increase in coal-based power production and a 43% increase in CO2
emissions by 2030. The EIA projection assumes no controls on CO2
emissions at the power plants.
The report comes amid increasing public concern and intensifying
pressure for limits on heat-trapping emissions from U.S. power plants
and rising investor concern about companies' long-term financial risk
from climate change. In the absence of federal regulations, business
uncertainty is growing as more U.S. states and regions move to enact
their own limits on CO2 emissions from power plants. The U.S. government
has opted for voluntary controls on carbon dioxide, but last year the
U.S. Senate adopted a resolution calling for mandatory emission limits.
"This report makes clear that SO2 and NOx regulations succeeded in
reducing pollution and minimizing financial exposure for companies,"
said Mindy S. Lubber, president at Ceres and director of the Investor
Network on Climate Risk, which is comprised of 50 institutional
investors managing nearly $3 trillion in assets. "However, voluntary
approaches for curbing greenhouse gas emissions are not working. Instead
of reducing pollution, we now have a spate of new coal plants and
inevitable greenhouse gas limits on a collision course that puts
companies and shareholders at financial risk."
"The report helps us assess our own performance, the performance of
competitors, and the industry as a whole in the context of the policies
we advocate," added Neil Brown, manager of governmental affairs and
external communications at PSEG. "Our view is that our industry can --
and should -- make significant improvements in environmental performance
and that this goal can be accomplished in ways that are affordable for
energy customers and mitigate risk for energy company investors. PSEG
continues to support improved environmental performance by the electric
power industry, including a national program of mandatory CO2 controls."
The report analyzes 2004 data submitted to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration by the
nation's 100 largest power companies that collectively operate nearly
2,000 power plants. The report focuses on four power plant pollutants --
mercury, CO2, SO2 and NOx -- which cause or contribute to significant
environmental and public health problems, including acid deposition in
lakes, streams and forests (SO2, NOx), ground-level ozone, or "smog," a
lung and asthma irritant (SO2), regional haze (NOx and SO2) and global
warming (CO2). In addition, mercury is a neurotoxin that can collect in
tissues of fish and is especially dangerous to pregnant women. The
report includes mercury data, based on the Toxics Release Inventory
published annual by the EPA.
The study found that a small number of companies produce a relatively
large amount of emissions, with three companies alone - American
Electric Power, Southern Company and Tennessee Valley Authority -
responsible for 24% of the industry's SO2 emissions, 21% of the NOx
emissions, 19% of the CO2 emissions and 22% of the mercury emissions.
The report also found wide disparities in emission rates -- the amount
of pollution generated for every kilowatt of electricity produced --
reflecting differences in management strategies, fuel mix and pollution
control technologies. For example, although American Electric Power
produced seven times more electricity than PG&E, the company was
responsible for 109 times the CO2 emissions. And Southern Company
produced about 58% more electricity than Entergy, but emitted 400% more
CO2.
According to the report's sponsors, this kind of comparative analysis is
useful for policymakers considering regulatory approaches; public
interest organizations concerned about public health and consumer costs;
and financial analysts and investors assessing company risk exposure as
global warming emission limits in the U.S. gain more momentum.
In addition to the aggregate corporate emissions data for 2004 provided
in this report, data for 2003 and specific power plant data for 2003 and
2004 are now available in spreadsheet form at online. To download
sortable data tables from this report, please visit NRDC's
Web site.