Washington, D.C. -- Friday, September 8, 2006)
EPA Proposes Steps to Improve New Source Review
Contact: John Millett, (202) 564-4355 / millett.john@epa.gov
The Bush Administration is proposing improvements to three specific areas of its
New Source Review (NSR) permitting program. These improvements will simplify the
process facility owners and operators must follow in determining whether plans
to modify their facility would trigger NSR requirements.
The Bush Administration's NSR improvements would accelerate investments in
cleaner energy-saving technologies. Existing permit limits on emissions would
not be affected, and the proposed changes would encourage investments in
refining capacity, improve industries' efficiency and reduce demand for natural
gas. The improvements would also lower energy costs to households and consumers.
Today's proposal includes the final set of proposals from EPA's 2002
recommendations to the president on how to clarify the NSR program to improve
investment in utility and refinery capacity. These proposals are also a part of
the president's clean air initiatives, which are designed to bring cleaner air
to Americans: the Clean Air Diesel rule will dramatically cut pollution by more
than 90 percent from heavy-duty diesel engines used in construction,
agricultural, and industrial equipment and the Clean Air Interstate Rule will
require coal-burning power plants to make the steepest emissions cuts in over a
decade. Together with other Clean Air Act programs, these landmark rules will
improve air quality so nearly all areas of the country will meet air quality
standards.
Today's proposal addresses the following three components:
1. Debottlenecking: EPA is proposing to change how NSR applies when an owner or
operator modifies one portion of a facility in such a manner that production or
throughput in other unchanged portions of the facility increases, thereby
increasing overall efficiency of the facility. This type of modification is
known as a "debottlenecking" project. Under the proposal, unchanged portions of
the facility would not be subject to NSR if emissions from those portions have
already been taken into account in a prior permit or regulatory action.
2. Aggregation: EPA is proposing to clarify how NSR applies when multiple
projects are implemented at a facility. EPA is proposing that projects that are
related should be treated as a single project (e.g. aggregated) if one of them
is dependent on another. The rule provides additional information about how EPA
makes this determination.
3. Project Netting: EPA is proposing to simplify the step in the calculation
used to determine whether NSR applies when emissions increases and decreases are
added together (called "netting").
Both aggregation and debottlenecking have been implemented through EPA guidance
on a case by case basis in the past. The proposal would provide certainty to
both the regulated community and the permitting authorities.
EPA will accept comment on this rule for 60 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
More information about the proposed improvements to the NSR program:
http://epa.gov/nsr/
R240