Energy system
worries officials
Aug 30, 2006 - Contra Costa Times, Walnut Creek,
Calif.
Author(s): Rick Jurgens
Aug. 30--SACRAMENTO -- Hard work and good luck, combined with
excellent hydroelectric conditions and overtime work from aging power
plants, enabled California to escape rolling blackouts during the July
heat storm, state and utility officials said Tuesday.
But although California's electricity system "responded surprisingly
well" during the record-breaking weather, which boosted electricity use
to a record of 50,270 megawatts, it cannot count on the same cushions in
a future energy crunch, said Scott Matthews of the state Energy
Commission. He noted that 138 deaths were attributed to the heat, and
urged better preparation for future events.
"We've experienced the limits of our risk tolerance," he warned at a
commission hearing that aimed to draw lessons from the recent heat wave.
Attendees were warned that this heat wave might not be the last.
Although many speakers described conditions as "unprecedented," few
predicted that they would not recur -- especially as greenhouse gas
accumulates in the atmosphere.
"What we have seen historically is very likely not what we're going
to see in the next few decades," said Daniel Cayan, a meteorologist at
the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. He warned that if greenhouse
gas emissions continue to grow, the state can expect heat waves that are
more intense, cover more territory and occur two to three times as
frequently.
Prior to the summer, the Energy Commission and California Independent
System Operator predicted statewide energy demand would peak about
47,000 megawatts.
Although last month's demand soared beyond that estimate, power
supplies were adequate. Imports of nearly 10,000 megawatts, including
power from hydroelectric projects in the northwest, kept the lights on,
officials said.
But hydro conditions were "optimal," said Jim Detmers of the ISO.
A bevy of PG&E officials at the hearing provided an updated version
of the heat wave's impact on the utility's 5 million customers. Although
the company said last month that 1.2 million customers lost power, a
subsequent analysis showed that 737,000 were affected, said Kevin Dasso,
the utility's director of asset investment planning.
But at PG&E and across the state, last month's outages occurred
despite adequate power supplies and a lack of congestion on the high-
voltage transmission lines that move power between regions.
Failures of transformers in the local distribution system caused most
of the problems, Dasso said. Noting reports in the media, including the
Times, that many of PG&E's nearly 1 million transformers were decades
old, he said that there was "no correlation between the age of
transformers and whether they were going to fail."
But others singled out older transformers as a weak link in their
systems. Representatives of Santa Clara's municipal utility and the Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power said that their older transformers
had an especially high failure rate.
Although forecasts said that power shortages would most likely occur
in Southern California, that is not how it turned out. In part, that is
because total demand was about 1,000 megawatts less than expected at the
highest points, a SoCal Edison spokesman said.
Some blamed lagging power plant construction on the lack of financial
payoffs available in a state power market overseen by regulators averse
to price hikes.
"We see the next three years as some pretty tough years in
California," said Gary Ackerman of the Western Power Trading Forum.
California Energy Commission member John Geesman and others at the
hearing worried that the state had also failed to achieve its goals for
so-called demand response programs that pay customers to ramp back
consumption when power is tight.
Among the participants in those programs is the Contra Costa County
government, which enrolled its jail and two office buildings in a
program that offers lower normal rates to customers who pay higher rates
on as many as a dozen hot afternoons.
That program backfired in July when one office building saw its
normal $20,000 bill jump by $5,000, but it could still pay off in the
long run, said Andy Green, the county's energy manager.
But William Marcus of the Utility Reform Network voiced skepticism
about how effective the new meters and varying rates would prove at
reducing demand. He urged regulators to instead expand programs that
allow utilities to ramp back electricity consumption by customers' air
conditioners and swimming pool heaters.
Rick Jurgens covers energy and business. Reach him at 925-943- 8088
or rjurgens@cctimes.com.
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|