SEIU: Wackenhut
to be Dropped as Security Contractor at Pilgrim Nuclear Plant ; Faulty
Security Performance, Use of Excessive Overtime, Inadequate Ability to
Train, Retain Staff at Issue
Aug 29, 2006 - PR Newswire
WASHINGTON, Aug. 29 /PRNewswire/ -- Wackenhut Corporation will likely
lose its security contract at the Pilgrim nuclear power plant, estimated
to be worth $5 million a year, as the Entergy Corporation recently
announced plans to take over the Plymouth, Massachusetts plant's
security operations after public and government criticism of Wackenhut's
performance. The Pilgrim plant was the subject of a special
investigation by Time magazine last summer which reported multiple
security problems. Entergy cancelled Wackenhut's contract at the Indian
Point nuclear power plant near New York City in 2003 after an internal
investigation uncovered numerous security problems.
Wackenhut, a wholly-owned subsidiary of London-based Group 4
Securicor, receives an estimated 12% of its total revenue from the
nuclear power industry where it is the largest security contractor.
Entergy announced plans to drop Wackenhut at Pilgrim in the midst of
a labor dispute with more than 100 security officers represented by
United Government Security Officers of America (UGSOA). Pilgrim guards
have been working for more than 6 months without a contract, and had
unanimously authorized a strike vote as Wackenhut sought to remove a
provision that guarantees that officers receive at least two days in a
row off work each week. Security officers at Pilgrim worked "thousands
of hours of overtime last year," according to a UGSOA official who
added, "Wackenhut is trying to trim the time-off allowed for guards who
are already working more overtime than ever." Pilgrim security officers
expressed concern over Wackenhut's plan to require workers taking
bereavement leave to show proof that they actually attended a funeral.
Excessive overtime has been linked to inadequate preparedness and
performance of security forces.
According to an Entergy spokesman, dropping Wackenhut and taking the
work in-house, will "reduce turnover, improve morale, and hopefully be
in the best interests of both the company and the employees." He added
that the move would make the job more attractive and encourage more
long-term employment by offering Entergy's benefits, such as a pension.
"By dropping Wackenhut, Entergy shows that raising standards for
security officers is a matter of necessity in a post-9/11 world," said
Stephen Lerner, Director of Property Services of Service Employees
International Union (SEIU), the nation's largest security officers'
union. "No matter how much money is spent on fences and weapons by
companies like Entergy, Wackenhut's low-road approach and disrespect for
its officers undermines security at our nation's most sensitive sites."
Faulty Security Performance
Last year Time magazine reported allegations by Kathy Davidson, who
said Wackenhut fired her as the chief guard trainer at Pilgrim for
complaining about poor security at the plant. Davidson alleged that mock
attackers succeeded in 28 of 29 drills designed to show how well the
guards could defend the plant from terrorist attacks. "Security at the
plant is pathetic," she told Time.
Wackenhut guards nearly half the nation's commercial nuclear power
plants and many highly sensitive nuclear weapons sites where there have
been numerous security problems. News of Entergy's plans to remove
Wackenhut at Pilgrim directly follows reports that the US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) proposed to fine Florida Power & Light
(FP&L) for a violation of security requirements at Wackenhut-guarded
Seabrook Station nuclear power plant in New Hampshire, marking the
fourth NRC investigation into security performance at Wackenhut-guarded
nuclear plants this year.
Inadequate Ability to Train, Retain Staff
Entergy's announcement drew reaction from the Project On Government
Oversight (POGO) whose reports on Wackenhut document a "failure to train
employees adequately and the practice of keeping them on duty for long
shifts." "They have some terrible problems," POGO's Peter Stockton said
of Wackenhut in an interview with the Boston Globe.
Wackenhut's wholly owned subsidiary, Wackenhut Services, Inc. is
facing an investigation concerning falsification of training records at
the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Reservation, according to the DOE
Inspector General. A conviction or civil judgment for falsification of
training records may be ground for suspension or debarment of contracts
under the U.S. government's federal acquisitions regulations.
Second Entergy Nuclear Plant to Drop Wackenhut
Entergy cancelled Wackenhut's contract at Indian Point #2 nuclear
facility, 35 miles north of New York City, and took security back in-
house in 2003 after conducting an internal investigation into
Wackenhut's performance. The findings of Entergy's internal
investigation of Wackenhut were leaked to the public; it found:
* Only one in five Wackenhut security officers felt prepared to
defend the plant.
* Wackenhut presented false information to plant management who was
conducting a government-ordered investigation into whether employees
could freely report safety concerns.
* Employee allegations that Wackenhut created a "chilled environment"
around the company's administration, personnel, discipline, and
general program management. Of those who raised issues to management, only
42% stated that those issues were adequately addressed and 12% believed
that Wackenhut retaliated against security officers for raising concerns
or making suggestions.
* Substantiated claims of sexual harassment "brought little apparent
disciplinary action and certainly did not result in termination." Officers reported that Wackenhut managers ordered them to write their
concerns on plain white sheets of paper instead of official
Information Reports, a method, Entergy reported, that "can lead to the loss of
concerns/complaints and could also be easily abused." When the
Entergy investigator sought to review the investigations and discipline
records relating to sexual harassment complaints, the Wackenhut manager told
him he does not maintain a central log, and that the materials could not
be located.
* Physical agility training was "extremely lax."
* Guards were allowed to take their weapons qualifying exams multiple
times so they could pass.
* Security officer attrition was nearly 20%, compared to
approximately 1% at the adjacent Indian Point #3 plant, where security was performed
by in-house employees.
For more information, visit
www.EyeonWackenhut.com
SOURCE Service Employees International Union
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|